Donate SIGN UP

Should this monster have got off so light?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 16:31 Wed 29th Jul 2009 | News
11 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-120299 0/Save-Children-paedophile-jailed-sneaking-Bri tain-Pakistan-despite-abusing-boy.html

To his credit was his co-operation with the police, his 'evident remorse', his pleas of guilty and previous good character.

That meant he would not be jailed indefinitely, even though the pre-sentence report made it clear he posed 'a high risk of harm to children'.

He would also be recommended for deportation. 'Recommended for deportation'?????????

He should have been put on the first available flight back to Pakistan.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 11 of 11rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Are you suggesting he should have had a longer sentence here or that he should not be have had to serve any sentence here and just been deported ?

You're not entirely clear.
Question Author
Better to deport him post haste.

Why should we keep him in luxury?
Because there's no guarantee of how much time he'd actually stay in prison in Pakistan?
Providing there's 100% certainty of his guilt, and I don't think there;s any doubt, a fitting punishment would be just to execute him. then send his remaims back to his home country.
Fitting but not lawful. In the real world, what is the option lonnie?
I can give you some idea about how long he might have stayed in prison had he been deported. Not too long. Because right or wrong but in Pakistan these sort of people are usually killed by some individuals. Even in the prison.
-- answer removed --
well yes either longer sentence to fit the crime or else deport him. Why should the tax payer fund his detainment in the UK. Given his jo and the posseible untold damage he could have caused if not discovered his sentence is way too leniant and in no way assissts in the protection of children in the future
I like the way the sentence was given, on the grounds of that he "co-operated" with the police. Well he would, wouldn't he, once caught. That judge's given out lenient ones before. He should've been deported immediately, or given double the time - at least.
It seems strange that we were caught dumping our rubbish in Brazil but we allow scum to enter and live here. The government took action on the former but not the latter. If other countries acted as we have done he would have been thrown out and let him serve his sentence elsewhere.

We have enough paedophiles of our own.
I have an inkling that in the future he will fight any deportation ruling by saying that his life would be in danger should he return to Pakistan...

1 to 11 of 11rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Should this monster have got off so light?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.