Technology1 min ago
french...nothing much more to add
are they still proudly flying the three white stripes of the french tricolour?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/arti cle-1207719/Desecration-hero-Hands-Churchill-s tatue-Paris-painted-blood-red-protesters-blami ng-death-millions.html
if not for churchill the french would be eating wurst and doing a days work......
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/arti cle-1207719/Desecration-hero-Hands-Churchill-s tatue-Paris-painted-blood-red-protesters-blami ng-death-millions.html
if not for churchill the french would be eating wurst and doing a days work......
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by kinell. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It is perhaps an irony that the man they most hate is one of those responsible for creating the conditions where they are allowed to safely hate people!
Lefties have have always hated the people that create the conditions for them, to have the freedom to potest and vilify. It just amuses me that they cannot ever see how stupid they are.
Lefties have have always hated the people that create the conditions for them, to have the freedom to potest and vilify. It just amuses me that they cannot ever see how stupid they are.
-- answer removed --
The Rense freedom group are a group of nutters. Every country has nutters, including France.
The Mail report says
"there was widespread anger at the attack on the statue, which is next to the Champs Elysees.
A spokesman for Paris City Hall said: 'There are French people who are not great fans of Churchill, but the vast majority honour and respect him and will be disgusted by this cowardly attack.
Which seems to be a unequivocal condemnation of the vandalism.
But let's ignore that, and instead indulge in some silly anti French nonsense.
The French state as a whole can not be blamed for this vandalism, just as us British cannot be blamed for jewish cemeteries being vandalised in this country.
The Mail report says
"there was widespread anger at the attack on the statue, which is next to the Champs Elysees.
A spokesman for Paris City Hall said: 'There are French people who are not great fans of Churchill, but the vast majority honour and respect him and will be disgusted by this cowardly attack.
Which seems to be a unequivocal condemnation of the vandalism.
But let's ignore that, and instead indulge in some silly anti French nonsense.
The French state as a whole can not be blamed for this vandalism, just as us British cannot be blamed for jewish cemeteries being vandalised in this country.
So what exactly did Churchill do to win the war - apart from make speeches Geezer. You make it sound as if he personally stormed the D-Day beaches
And whilst you're blaming the entire French nation for this you might like to explain how such an ungrateful nation came to errect the statue in the first place - one of the few to any Briton in Paris?
And whilst you're blaming the entire French nation for this you might like to explain how such an ungrateful nation came to errect the statue in the first place - one of the few to any Briton in Paris?
Well forgive me for not wanting to start a Churchill discussion jake, it's a long and complex one and my employers are keen that I do some work!
Gromit I take that on board but really no red bl00ded Englishmen would miss a chance for a bit of Froggy bashing as when the boots on the other foot the French would no doubt enjoy bashing the Rosbifs!
Gromit I take that on board but really no red bl00ded Englishmen would miss a chance for a bit of Froggy bashing as when the boots on the other foot the French would no doubt enjoy bashing the Rosbifs!
They only needed �250,00 and raised it, so dividing by the total population is a pointless exercise.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/206930.stm
Donations ranged from 20 to 200,000 francs.
In answer to my own earlier question, The statue of Roosvelt in Grovenor Square was funded by public fundraising. I expect if the cost of that was divided by the UK population, that too would be a piffling sum each as well.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/206930.stm
Donations ranged from 20 to 200,000 francs.
In answer to my own earlier question, The statue of Roosvelt in Grovenor Square was funded by public fundraising. I expect if the cost of that was divided by the UK population, that too would be a piffling sum each as well.
Interestingly, it looks like they had less trouble finding the money for Churchill than they did for this bloke..
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe /de-gaulle-statue-fund-short-of-pound200000-69 9534.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe /de-gaulle-statue-fund-short-of-pound200000-69 9534.html
..Also, I don't think it was the french that did this..
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/740524.stm
You can't condemn a whole country because of a few tw@ts.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/740524.stm
You can't condemn a whole country because of a few tw@ts.
Gromit
Chuchill's statue in Paris was funded by public donations.
Can you imagine the British doing that for a foreign leader?
Nelson Mandela and Abraham Lincoln, to name just a couple.
I presume we payed for these? Everything is funded by public donations (taxes).
The Government doesn't have any money of its own.
Chuchill's statue in Paris was funded by public donations.
Can you imagine the British doing that for a foreign leader?
Nelson Mandela and Abraham Lincoln, to name just a couple.
I presume we payed for these? Everything is funded by public donations (taxes).
The Government doesn't have any money of its own.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.