http://news.bbc.co.uk.../business/8411984.stm
back to the good old days of labour? The trouble is that the "rich" on any scale are rare so the amount rasied even at 95% as in old labour days, is not much in the scheme of things, so what is termed "rich" pretty quickly becomes anyone earning £50k or so. Effort is surely better spent in reducing the colossal Public sector.
And the trouble with reducing the public sector is that you lose their tax contributions and pay them social security and other benefits. So you don't save half as much as the headline figure by the time you include the under the table costs
It's not easy - everybody has to take a share of the pain - especially the rich as they benefitted so much more from the good times.
Isn't the big flaw with your plan that, the extra 2 - 3 million people on unemployment Benefit will have to be paid for by a smaller and smaller workforce, so they will inevitably pay more and more.
Keeping people in jobs is the best way to stave off a long recession.
Here's a thought - If it's cheaper for the state to employ people than support them on benefits, why don't we employ all the people currently on benefits? Call them 'community outreach workers' , Duties - 'staying at home doing exactly what you do at the moment', salary - same as what you currently claim on benefits but with 30% taken back in taxes. Genius, if I say so myself.
yes I am very rich and would like to keep most of it, so I don't want a load of lefties giving my money to poor people. Well spotted Brionon, you spotted that eh?
"And that's why you should vote Conservative"
I think that's a very sad refelection on what has happened to the concept of democracy over the last 50 years.
Let me be clear, I'm not saying that you shouldn't vote Conservative, but the orginal concept of a democracy was a society in which people voted for what they thought was right, fair, just, and best for the country and its people. Nowadays, people vote for what they imagine to be their own short-term interests.
I said that you got back much smaller amounts of savings than it appeared - it's false accounting - you claim to save x Billion by Whitehall cuts but in reality you bump up social security payments and lose on taxes.
Great for politicians who like to be seen wielding the axe not so good in reality.
Putting people on the dole is not as expensive as you might think Jake. All the money gets spent on booze, fags and lottery cards, so most it comes back as tax anyway.