Hoon/Hewitt betrayal

[youngmafbog]

So now a secret ballot has been requested to ascetain McBottles popularity.

Bet they are spitting feathers down No10, but looks like its loose/loose for Bottler. Difficult to see how you get out of somethign like this without some sort of collateal damage.

No doubt he will return to bullying again, comments from ABers ?

[Sqad]

I have already started one called "Big Hitter" in the News Section

[youngmafbog]

Yes but you c*cked it up and I wrote this inbetween !

[Sqad]

OK....I will back down and support your thread.

[Sqad]

(Wed 13:04 06/Jan/10) Mark As Best Answer Report This
Question Author
Sorry...pressed the wrong nob.

Hoone/Hewitt challenge to Gordon Brow's leadership.....they can't do this with success without being backed by a "Big Hitter"....a Cabinet Minister?.......who is he?

[R1Geezer]

I reckon it's Harman behind all this, she knows Labour can't win and would love to get her picture on the No 10 Staircase if only for being PM for a matter of weeks. She's using the back benchers, who are staring down the barrell of actually having to get a proper job, as a weapon against Brown. That's the Geezer theory only believe it when sh has officially denied it!

[Sqad]

R1...interesting.

[youngmafbog]

Sorry I didnt think you made much of a point. If you mean by the use of McBottle Brown is Scottish = fact and he Bottled an election = fact and relevant here. It is a term used by the popular press too so whats your beef. Nice try on the racism card though, guess your a Noo Labour *&^& with that comment.

Quite how I am treading a similar path with this thread I dont know. These two only announced it today - or can I see into the future now . Lucky me

[youngmafbog]

Take it your a Jock then

Get the chip off your shoulder and try answering the question mate.

[IggyB]

loose / loose??? McBottles?? Noo Labour??
what are you all on about

[Quizmonster]

One wonders what it is like inside the head of someone who STILL thinks it is either apt, up-to-date or amusing to use names such as McBottle for Gordon Brown. However - if it IS still funny, apt and up-to-date - let's all start calling the Tory leader McHugga on the basis that he is of Scottish ancestry, as someone else has just said, and thought once that hugging a hoodie - or was it a husky? - was a good idea.

[NoMercy]

I was wondering myself about the loose/loose?

Whiffey would have been churning...

[Sqad]

Typical of AB...a most interesting or potentially interesting thread is becoming personalised.

Oh! dear.

[Quizmonster]

So you think combining the words Hoon, Hewitt and betrayal in a question-title is "UNpersonalised", I presume.

[Sqad]

Qizmaster....I may be wrong, but I think that the word you are searching for is DEpersonalised....I may be wrong.

[youngmafbog]

ok how about

"Hoon/Hewitt Betrayal ?" ie with a question mark

I was hoping to get some good debate here, it is a very topical question dominating the news but unfrtunatley some are more concerned with being PC or having a huge chip on their shoulder. Much as I dislike Brown (There happy ?) I think this is a betrayal, afterall why do it now while Brown and labour are riding a high? Now can we have some debate please ?

BTW I really dont care what you call Cameron - so please feel free so long as it is in the topic of my question plase.

[Quizmonster]

(My user-name is QUizmONster, not Qizmaster.) I generally use DEpersonalise in its sense of dehumanise, which is not - as far as can see - what is at stake here. However, you are more than welcome to change my last answer to fit the parameters you have given. I'll even do it for you...

"So you think combining the words Hoon, Hewitt and betrayal in a question-title is "DEpersonalised", I presume."

And your answer now is...?

[Quizmonster]

Your latest offering wasn't there when I started to write mine, obviously, Youngmafbog. The problem with your idea of adding a question-mark to the title to make it appear more open-minded is that your later use of McBottle's, Bottler and bullying make it clear that you are not in reality opening a discussion at all...at least not one that you expect rational contributions to...so much as making a right-wing point.