ChatterBank0 min ago
Why all the fuss, its hardly a suprise ?
5 Answers
As is now becoming clear (as if it wasnt already !) Blair and others ignored nearly all of his lawyers advice re going to war on iraq.
Of course him and his cronies did, they had no choice, Blair had already promised GW that he would weigh in he had no choice he couldnt welch on his promise.
unless GW called the whole shebang off good ole Tone had no other way of getting out of the Krap hed gotten into, it was a done deal he was just going through the motions with all his meetings and consultations.
forget all the reasons, given it was for oil , wmd, sadaam was a naught boy, it was this, it was that blah blah they were all irelevant at the end of the day.
GW new the USA would never get away with it on their own, it wasnt that he needed military assistance he needed others to shoulder the blame, so he got gullible tony to help out and here we are today wasting money on an inquiry to tell us nothing and hold nobody to account.
How phrickin pointless is that
Of course him and his cronies did, they had no choice, Blair had already promised GW that he would weigh in he had no choice he couldnt welch on his promise.
unless GW called the whole shebang off good ole Tone had no other way of getting out of the Krap hed gotten into, it was a done deal he was just going through the motions with all his meetings and consultations.
forget all the reasons, given it was for oil , wmd, sadaam was a naught boy, it was this, it was that blah blah they were all irelevant at the end of the day.
GW new the USA would never get away with it on their own, it wasnt that he needed military assistance he needed others to shoulder the blame, so he got gullible tony to help out and here we are today wasting money on an inquiry to tell us nothing and hold nobody to account.
How phrickin pointless is that
Answers
1 to 5 of 5
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Maybe you should offer to write Chilcot's report for him.
Personally, I found yesterday with the two FO lawyers saying the war was illegal, was very interesting. I am glad that a (mostly) public Inquiry is taking place, and the role the various Ministers took during the disastrous decision to go to war is set out for all to see.
Nothing may be accomplished by the Inquiry, the clock cannot be turned back, but those with blood on their hands should not be allowed to hide behind secrecy and 70 year embargoes.
Personally, I found yesterday with the two FO lawyers saying the war was illegal, was very interesting. I am glad that a (mostly) public Inquiry is taking place, and the role the various Ministers took during the disastrous decision to go to war is set out for all to see.
Nothing may be accomplished by the Inquiry, the clock cannot be turned back, but those with blood on their hands should not be allowed to hide behind secrecy and 70 year embargoes.
"those with blood on their hands should not be allowed to hide behind secrecy and 70 year embargoes"
At the very least they should be made to face the facts.
http://www.arrestblair.org/
At the very least they should be made to face the facts.
http://www.arrestblair.org/
-- answer removed --
1 to 5 of 5
Latest Posts
Photograph Location - Help Needed.
How it Works14 mins ago
Technology20 mins ago
Is This Man A Good Pick For Secretary Of...
News23 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.