Is this one step towards an Islamic State?

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.telegraph....the-Labour-Party.html

Do some on this site still believe that Britain could never become an Islamic State?

[Quinlad]

I love that youtube video. It's so bad it actually sounds like someone spoofing dumb media rhetoric.

The opening line ("According to research...") is so lazily vague I assumed it was a p*ss-take. It's a bit like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mnVWJpMhuE

[naomi24]

sp, I fail to see your reasoning. Why is it a mathematical impossibility?

[Quinlad]

Let us know how you get on, yeah?

[jno]

the Rwandans are rolling out the red carpet already

[123everton]

It's a classic innit Quinlad, the maths throughout it is demonstably poor and plainly wrong, the trick is you see, is that it doesn't matter.
People who espouse empty headed rhetoric will promote it, the people who support the contention of a Muslim birthrate inspired takeover but wish to appear informed will ignore it simply because it's style is too poor, if they'd made it more glossy and used bigger words etc. they may get a wider audience.
I loved the bit about Russia, they're Russian Muslims, they haven't moved anywhere in 100s of years, Russia came to them not vice versa.

[jno]

quite so, Everton, and the Muslims of India were still living there when the British empire went and got them. Of course Brits in those days didn't spend their lives quivering in fear of foreigners; I sometimes think they would be a bit disappointed in their descendants.

[123everton]

I've posted it (again) as a question, let's see how many think it's valid enough to prove their point.
Funnily enough "according to research" (their research) Italy and Spain have the lowest birthrates (both staunchly Catholic) kinda makes the current debate arguments sex education in schools mute.
Either that or it's poor usage of data and made up statistics.

[naomi24]

Everton, this question relates to Britain, not to the rest of the world - and your link has been posted and discussed on AB umpteen times before.

[123everton]

The question's up Naomi, read through it and state your case.

[naomi24]

Everton, I've seen it and I've discussed it before. This thread concerns Britain.

[Lonnie]

naomi, as soon as I read sp1814, reply, I was going to ask the same question, i'll be interested to read it.

General now,
to my mind, the things that make it possible, is the destruction of the Immigration laws, Political Correctness, and the Human Rights Laws.

As a group, more than anyone else, Muslims shout the loudest, get more done for them, and get pandered to by this goverment the most, and in my opinion, which obviously differs from quite a few others, its now too late to stop them gaing power legally or otherwise, in the not too distant future.

[naomi24]

Hello Lonnie, yes indeed, his maths should make interesting reading.

[123everton]

Never mind questioning Sp's mathematics how about substantiating your own?
Refute this statement from my other question.
// In order for a culture to maintain itself for more than 25 years, (it) requires a fertility rate of 2.11 children per family //

So when did the UK fertility rate fall below 2.11?

38 years ago. And we are still here and still white and predominently British.
Do you refute the content of the link I've provided as being a falsehood?

[naomi24]

Everton, I'm not sure whether you're talking to Lonnie or to me because we're both waiting for SP to substantiate his claim that the mathematics are impossible - but goodness, please don't tell me you don't understand the implications in the Times link either. I wouldn't have thought it was that difficult.

It's quite simple. If one section of society is growing ten times faster than any other, then if that trend continues eventually that section will obviously form the majority.

[naomi24]

Sorry, I didn't answer your question. I've looked at the opening sequence of your link and found it familiar but irrelevant since this question concerns Britain.