Donate SIGN UP

Cant go to battle today , need to look after the kids !

Avatar Image
bazwillrun | 09:11 Tue 13th Apr 2010 | News
20 Answers
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8616866.stm

And to add insult to injury she has the cheek to play the race card as well
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 20rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
what next? a creche on military bases? You couldn't make it up!
This is a prime example of all the right reasons we should kick this shower in government out of office and put UKIP into power to redress the balance in our favour
Its rediculous, couldn't she send her child to a play group or nursery or get a child minder . . . .
-- answer removed --
If its unsuitable for someone its unsuitable for them.

Like its unsuitable for a recovering alcoholic to work in a pub etc etc.
-- answer removed --
Supose so.
Isn't it rather irresponsible to have a child as a single parent when you are are in the armed forces and could therefore be sent to the front line and killed. It is bad enough when there is a partner at home looking after the kids while dad or mum go to war. Or am I going to offend the thought police with comments like that?
Thats true rowan, and she hasn't got other family in the uk,
-- answer removed --
>They hired her know that she was a single mother

I heard on the news she was NOT a single mother when joining the army, but then became pregnant.

But I agree that these people ALWAYS seem to play the race card.

They expect US not to be racist, but as soon as anything goes wrong they say it is because of their race.
In future lets not hire any women of child bearing age - just in case they get pregnant. Ridiculous idea isn't it but I fear that a lack of common sense and realistic attitude by both women and employers will lead this to being the norm
a good example of wanting your cake and eating it.
VHG

It would appear from the story that she was already a single mother when she was hired.

"Her daughter was initially cared for by her family in St Vincent. She then brought her child to England"

Rather than being a case of wanting to have her cake and eat it, I'd suggest it's a
case of her wanting to have her cake, and defend this country so we can continue to log onto AB and criticise from the comfort of our armchairs.

Not sure how racial discrimination comes into it though. That's quite odd.
Both my missus and I were in the Army, not that many years ago, and when we got married, she left the service. Also, had a serving female soldier become pregnant, she would also have been discharged.

Nowadays, it's like a kindergarten where everything has turned full circle to the extent that instead of individuals serving their country, it's the exact opposite. The Army isn't some cosy, 9-5, Monday-Friday, every weekend plus bank holidays off, type of job, it's meant to be vocational where you serve the needs of your nation.

The likes of Churchill must be spinning in his grave: can you imagine if he'd been confronted with such stupidity during WWII? We'd all be speaking German.
she probably thinks the case will hold more water if race is involved aswell.
There are so many cases of constructive dismissal, racist/sexist/homophobic bullying and abuse of staff coming out of the army, you have to wonder about the meatheaded mentalities of the people in charge.

We're told that they're highly trained and disciplined men and women but they struggle to obey regulations that the rest of us cope with comfortably. Do they pick and choose?

Say what you like about the toughness or otherwise of the people on the receiving end of it, but if tactically aware officers are unable to follow incredibly simple anti-discrimination rules and rudimentary employment law, they shouldn't be entrusted with leading military campaigns.

No wonder we've not won in Afghanistan. It's scary.
the country has an interest in having a trained army. It also has an interest in not letting children grow up unparented. So there are laws. Apparently the military thought its interests came ahead of the law. They were wrong.

The country also has an interest in having its military obey the law.
You can imagine the email to the enemy.

"Excuse us but do you think we could delay the battle until the Nursery opens"

What a sad pathetic joke this country has become under Noo (and Red) Labour.
Some have blamed the Government, some the MOD, but I think in this case it is the judges fault for coming to such a decision, he should have thrown her case out of court.

We are becoming more and more accustomed to some of these judges making mad-cap rulings, isn't the time overdue, when Judges should be elected into office?

1 to 20 of 20rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Cant go to battle today , need to look after the kids !

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.