News3 mins ago
Lord Triesman quits FA
4 Answers
http://news.bbc.co.uk.../football/8685009.stm
I know little and care even less about football, but should Lord Triesman have quit?
Almost all the press have joined together to belittle him, and the mighty FA have closed ranks, to try and smooth things over.
But what has he really done, he has opened his mouth about something to do with Spain and Russia, to someone he regarded as a friend.
Of all the reports I have heard, I have heard very little of where he got this information, is it true, and if so why hasn't it been investigated into more openly?
Could it be, that if there is fire amongst that smoke, it won't be made public, because there is far too much money involved?
I know little and care even less about football, but should Lord Triesman have quit?
Almost all the press have joined together to belittle him, and the mighty FA have closed ranks, to try and smooth things over.
But what has he really done, he has opened his mouth about something to do with Spain and Russia, to someone he regarded as a friend.
Of all the reports I have heard, I have heard very little of where he got this information, is it true, and if so why hasn't it been investigated into more openly?
Could it be, that if there is fire amongst that smoke, it won't be made public, because there is far too much money involved?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Exactly, AOG ...
What has he done?
Had a humorous little dig at the Dagos and the Russkies.
Was there any foundation in what he said?
Probably none at all.
That is why several newspapers turned down this ludicrous story, and only that sleazy, gutter rag, the Mail, with it's sleazebag Editor, decided to print it.
There are, nowadays, no depths to which that scurrilous trash rag will not sink.
What has he done?
Had a humorous little dig at the Dagos and the Russkies.
Was there any foundation in what he said?
Probably none at all.
That is why several newspapers turned down this ludicrous story, and only that sleazy, gutter rag, the Mail, with it's sleazebag Editor, decided to print it.
There are, nowadays, no depths to which that scurrilous trash rag will not sink.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.