News1 min ago
Pleased at BNPs failure?
28 Answers
http://www.independen...-failure-1976138.html
Whether one is a BNP supporter or not, would it have been better in the name of democracy, if there had been at least two BNP MPs in the Commons?
Controversial I know, but before most of you go "Ape S**t", just give it some serious thinking.
Whether one is a BNP supporter or not, would it have been better in the name of democracy, if there had been at least two BNP MPs in the Commons?
Controversial I know, but before most of you go "Ape S**t", just give it some serious thinking.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
SP says 'Seriously - it now takes away the central plank of the "silent majority nonsense". The so-called silent majority had their chance to vote in the BNP and they didn't. '
Not so. How many people wouldve voted BNP but didnt have a candidate standing for election in their constituency? You can only vote for who's on the card! Whereas the big 3 parties wouldve have candidates in every area.
Not so. How many people wouldve voted BNP but didnt have a candidate standing for election in their constituency? You can only vote for who's on the card! Whereas the big 3 parties wouldve have candidates in every area.
@ AoG - This answer of yours -
*I give up when some people's minds are so filled with the thoughts of the rest of the diseased sheep, and can only see in tunnel vision, they are obviously not qualified to carry out an adult debate on controversial issues, without the need to relentlessly grind their own dull axe."
- very nearly rates with Cantonas favourite oft quoted phrase about tankers and seagulls. Did you mean anything with it, or were you just attempting profound? ( If the latter, by the way, you failed)
@SNAFU - The BNP fielded candidates only in those areas where they felt they had the best chance -repeat: the best chance - of gaining votes, and in only 4 of the seats they contested did they get enough support to retain their deposit. Hardly a ringing endorsement, and on that basis, why do you think they would have done any better had they fielded a greater number of candidates?
*I give up when some people's minds are so filled with the thoughts of the rest of the diseased sheep, and can only see in tunnel vision, they are obviously not qualified to carry out an adult debate on controversial issues, without the need to relentlessly grind their own dull axe."
- very nearly rates with Cantonas favourite oft quoted phrase about tankers and seagulls. Did you mean anything with it, or were you just attempting profound? ( If the latter, by the way, you failed)
@SNAFU - The BNP fielded candidates only in those areas where they felt they had the best chance -repeat: the best chance - of gaining votes, and in only 4 of the seats they contested did they get enough support to retain their deposit. Hardly a ringing endorsement, and on that basis, why do you think they would have done any better had they fielded a greater number of candidates?
Let's just clarify something...
BNP voters are as thick as whale omelettes.
If you need evidence, look up a programme called 'BNP Wives' on YouTube.
Thick, educationally subnormal mouth-breathing failures.
Anyone voting BNP is shouting to the rest of the country "I am a failure and my children are call Wayne and Sonia (and have suspiciously close-set eyes)".
Everything above this line is true and is irrefutable.
(BNP voters think that 'irrefutable' is the opposite of futable...because they only spent sixteen days out of their teens at school...the dumbasses).
BNP voters are as thick as whale omelettes.
If you need evidence, look up a programme called 'BNP Wives' on YouTube.
Thick, educationally subnormal mouth-breathing failures.
Anyone voting BNP is shouting to the rest of the country "I am a failure and my children are call Wayne and Sonia (and have suspiciously close-set eyes)".
Everything above this line is true and is irrefutable.
(BNP voters think that 'irrefutable' is the opposite of futable...because they only spent sixteen days out of their teens at school...the dumbasses).
Snafu03
And in consituencies where the BNP stood - how many winners?
ZERO.
This is what this says about the British..."we are too smart to fall for the rantings of racist failures in sweatu Primark suits".
There is literally nothing left to say about the BNP.
Nick Griffin and the rest of his tiresome failure-mongers are history.
It's time to look to the future.
AOG - you should be embarrassed. The whole country has rejected your brand of racism.
How does it feel to be in a minority?
Weird isn't it?
And in consituencies where the BNP stood - how many winners?
ZERO.
This is what this says about the British..."we are too smart to fall for the rantings of racist failures in sweatu Primark suits".
There is literally nothing left to say about the BNP.
Nick Griffin and the rest of his tiresome failure-mongers are history.
It's time to look to the future.
AOG - you should be embarrassed. The whole country has rejected your brand of racism.
How does it feel to be in a minority?
Weird isn't it?
AOG
Seriously, read this post from Lazygun:
"The BNP fielded candidates only in those areas where they felt they had the best chance -repeat: the best chance - of gaining votes, and in only 4 of the seats they contested did they get enough support to retain their deposit. Hardly a ringing endorsement, and on that basis, why do you think they would have done any better had they fielded a greater number of candidates? "
What's your comment on that?
<I will give £10 to a charity of my own choice if AOG is able to answer this..I know that we will hear nothing but silence, perhaps accompanied by the distant sounds of teeth being gnashed>
Seriously, read this post from Lazygun:
"The BNP fielded candidates only in those areas where they felt they had the best chance -repeat: the best chance - of gaining votes, and in only 4 of the seats they contested did they get enough support to retain their deposit. Hardly a ringing endorsement, and on that basis, why do you think they would have done any better had they fielded a greater number of candidates? "
What's your comment on that?
<I will give £10 to a charity of my own choice if AOG is able to answer this..I know that we will hear nothing but silence, perhaps accompanied by the distant sounds of teeth being gnashed>
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
ChatterBank6 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles10 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles20 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.