Anyone For "Sarah's Law"?

[OrcadianOil]

Yet another kiddie fiddler has managed to ply his evil trade and has been able to groom at least one more innocent child right under its mother's nose. He has been "severely punished" with a wet lettuce leaf and given 4 months inside. (He may well have been released by the time I've finished typing!)

It proves, does it not, that the present system is deeply flawed? Maybe the introduction of "Sarah's Law", where paedos are "named, shamed" and the address of the sewer they're presently living in is made known to the wider community, would nip such atrocities in the bud?

Or do the "bleeding hearts" win the day again by arguing that the "human rights" of the pervert are far more precious than the safety of innocent children? Woops, no, we daren't risk having vigilante patrols on the streets. No, let our kids suffer instead, eh?

http://www.newsofthew...-reveal-his-name.html

[Greedyfly]

Wind up or not it is still beyond ridiculous

[joeluke]

LL.......yawn......heard that one before

I also have very strong views against the subject of the OP here but that doesn't mean I wanna try it

[Zeuhl]

It's odd that you consider yourself a 'real man' JL.

It seems the women on this site find you repulsive.
.

[ummmm]

Haha....good one Zehul.

[joeluke]

Like I care

[ummmm]

Zeuhl *

[LoftyLottie]

You have heard it before because it very often is the case Joe Luke. I feel sorry for your son being brought up by a Numpty Bigot!! Your partner obviously must share your views to put up with you.

[joggerjayne]

How do discussions about paedophiles ...

... somehow lead to homosexuals ?

Most paedophiles are heterosexual. Male paedophiles usually abuse girls, not boys.

[joeluke]

No she doesn't, she's a woman and like I said women are more tolerant of gays

[Zeuhl]

Maybe JL's partner is a 'real man' too!
.

[Greedyfly]

My father was like this, I never tolerated him and I disowned him.

[Greedyfly]

JJ - exactly, that has been asked a couple of times during this discussion unfortunately Joelukes 'views' have caused outrage and it ha snow taken over the thread.

[joeluke]

Disowning your relative???

Isn't that exactly the thing you are slagging me off for saying I'd do?

[Zeuhl]

Sorry about that Greedy.

I sincerely hope that doesn't happen to JL but the signs aren't good.

.

[Greedyfly]

I disowned him because he was a bigot, an abusive husband and a racist and I have no time for such people. I did not want to be brought up by someone like him and become like him!

Thank god I didn't

[joeluke]

^ The signs aren't good for what?

My son will never turn out to be gay cos he will know the difference between right and wrong

[Zeuhl]

JL

Presumably Greedy disowned her father because of the way he behaved not because of who he was.

.

[joeluke]

People in glass houses...........

[Zeuhl]

///cos he will know the difference between right and wrong ///

So he will just grow up into a very unhappy and possibly repressed gay.

That's okay then is it?

.

[joggerjayne]

Although I am in the opposite camp from joeluke, and have had a relationship with another girl ... well, two actually ...

... I think we have to be careful not to attack joeluke just because of his beliefs.

Attack his opinions ... but do not attack him personally ...

... otherwise you can no longer claim to be "tolerant"

joeluke is entitled to his views ... I disagree with them ... but, as far as I can see, he is not hurting anyone. He's not going out and beating up gays, or anything.

We need to respect views with which we disagree, however vehemently.