Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Why so much money being poured into Afganistan?
So we are going to give MORE money to Afganistan (we have already given £500 million in the last four years in aid).
At the same time we are slashing our school rebuilding program in our own country as we have no money.
I bet when the UK population pay their taxes they expect it to go on our schools, hospitals, the police etc, not to look after a hell hole of a country hundreds of miles away.
I wonder if Afganistan would ever give us money if the roles were reversed.
At the same time we are slashing our school rebuilding program in our own country as we have no money.
I bet when the UK population pay their taxes they expect it to go on our schools, hospitals, the police etc, not to look after a hell hole of a country hundreds of miles away.
I wonder if Afganistan would ever give us money if the roles were reversed.
Answers
1 to 14 of 14
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by VHG. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
come on, VHG, you know why we went into Afghanistan: 9/11 and Taliban support for it. I believe we screwed up by charging off into Iraq before finishing the job; it doesn't look as if we're going to win either of these, and we can only hope the Taliban aren't back stronger than ever in ten years. Is it worth laying out money now to try to stop that happening? I don't think the answer is as obvious as you suggest.
Yes because we're just going to pull out of Afghanistan and they'll all go back to living a nice peacefull existance and there will be proper government and Al Qaeda won't be straight back in there and Julie Andrews will skip over the Khyber pass singing songs in a nun's costume.
The whole withdrawal concept is based around the Afghans taking over security in 4 years
Hmm isn't that just before the election - what an odd coincidence.
That's not going to happen without money is it?
The whole withdrawal concept is based around the Afghans taking over security in 4 years
Hmm isn't that just before the election - what an odd coincidence.
That's not going to happen without money is it?
VHG
It comes down to natural resources. We're not doing this merely for altruistic purposes.
Immediately across the Caspian from Azerbaijan, is the former Soviet Central Asian republic of Turkmenistan, an area of 488,000 sq. miles, bigger than the whole of Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana and Oklahoma combined. It has enormous oil, gas, coal and other natural resources and significantly, directly adjoins Afghanistan to the south.
Uzbekistan, which covers an area of 172,000 sq. miles, roughly equivalent to the combined states of Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, has vast resources in oil, gas, coal, copper and gold as well as being a huge cotton producer. It too, has a frontier with Afghanistan to its south, as does Tajikistan. Tajikistan Tajikistan is over 55,000 sq. miles, an area slightly bigger than Illinois. It too has very rich deposits of oil, gas, coal, lead, zinc, uranium, radium and many other minerals.
It comes down to natural resources. We're not doing this merely for altruistic purposes.
Immediately across the Caspian from Azerbaijan, is the former Soviet Central Asian republic of Turkmenistan, an area of 488,000 sq. miles, bigger than the whole of Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana and Oklahoma combined. It has enormous oil, gas, coal and other natural resources and significantly, directly adjoins Afghanistan to the south.
Uzbekistan, which covers an area of 172,000 sq. miles, roughly equivalent to the combined states of Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, has vast resources in oil, gas, coal, copper and gold as well as being a huge cotton producer. It too, has a frontier with Afghanistan to its south, as does Tajikistan. Tajikistan Tajikistan is over 55,000 sq. miles, an area slightly bigger than Illinois. It too has very rich deposits of oil, gas, coal, lead, zinc, uranium, radium and many other minerals.
The biggest plum in the Central Asian pie is Kazakhstan, a country of more than 1,000 000 sq. miles. This is almost twice the size of Alaska, the largest of the American states and greater in extent than the combined Canadian provinces of Ontario and New Brunswick. It has absolutely vast reserves of coal, oil, gas, manganese, copper, bauxite, gold, uranium and many other minerals as well as a high degree of industrial and agricultural development, including much of the former Soviet aerospace and defense industries. It is bound to the west by the Caspian sea and on the south by Uzbekistan, through which it can be reached from Afghanistan.
The strategic importance of Afghanistan is therefore the route into a vast region covering almost 2 million sq. miles with vast untapped natural resources and other than through Iran or China, which are not options available to the US. or UK. Afghanistan is the only feasible bridgehead to the principal major markets in the Pacific rim.
It's in our best interests to promote stablilty and open 'in roads' into the region.
It's WAY more complicated that simply "bunging cash at the region with no payback".
There's payback all the way down the line.
The strategic importance of Afghanistan is therefore the route into a vast region covering almost 2 million sq. miles with vast untapped natural resources and other than through Iran or China, which are not options available to the US. or UK. Afghanistan is the only feasible bridgehead to the principal major markets in the Pacific rim.
It's in our best interests to promote stablilty and open 'in roads' into the region.
It's WAY more complicated that simply "bunging cash at the region with no payback".
There's payback all the way down the line.
AOG
It's extracted from http://www.opendemocr...nistan_to_the_u_s_b_0
As a side bar, the site has a particularly interesting take on the burqa ban:
http://www.opendemocr.../dangers-of-burqa-ban
Seems to a 'left leaning' site, but with some well-written and researched articles.
It's extracted from http://www.opendemocr...nistan_to_the_u_s_b_0
As a side bar, the site has a particularly interesting take on the burqa ban:
http://www.opendemocr.../dangers-of-burqa-ban
Seems to a 'left leaning' site, but with some well-written and researched articles.
-- answer removed --
The Andrew Neill show on BBC2 was worth watching when he grilled Alan Duncan about aid to Afghanistan. Neill pointed out the money that was stacked on pallets waiting to leave the country while the poor Afghans received nothing. Neill pointed out that our money was being wasted but the only reply was that Britain is leading the world in how to give charity.
If these same politicians are adept at putting taxpayers money in their own pockets it doesn't surprise me they are using the same money to satisy their consciences.
If these same politicians are adept at putting taxpayers money in their own pockets it doesn't surprise me they are using the same money to satisy their consciences.
sp1814
/// Seems to a 'left leaning' site, but with some well-written and researched articles.///
Not a touch of bias here then?
Would you have said "seems to a 'right leaning' site, but with some well-written and researched articles"
But then you would not be trawling right leaning sites would you?
/// Seems to a 'left leaning' site, but with some well-written and researched articles.///
Not a touch of bias here then?
Would you have said "seems to a 'right leaning' site, but with some well-written and researched articles"
But then you would not be trawling right leaning sites would you?
1 to 14 of 14
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.