(I've no idea if anyone has already made this pint, as I'm not gonna read through 114 posts to find out lol)
The problem with this case in particular is the amount of emotion stirred up by the case involved. The law (by definition) has to be emotionless, and the decisions and rules based on logic and reason.
Regardless of whether you agree with the sentance or not (and I do), we do not have it in this country. As a result a prisoner sentanced to live the rest of his life behind bars has the basic right to expect food, water, shelter, medical care and safety.
Now Huntley has stirred up this passion because of what he has done, but take the name of the prisoner out of the equation. Would you be advocating a similar sort of mob punishment against a stockbroker convicted of fraud, or a housewife who ran someone down whilst talking on her phone, or the old lady who repeatedly refused to pay her council tax, or the husband who came home to find his wife in bed with his best mate and punched the mate to death? These people are all criminals too.
We are a civilised nation because we have a rule of law that is dictated by reason, not by a media-led frenzy based on biased opinions and reported facts.