Donate SIGN UP

Sad news.

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 11:58 Sat 09th Oct 2010 | News
9 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/...d-south-asia-11507313

This is very sad news indeed, and my sympathies go out to her family and friends.

But at least three questions need to be asked.

1/ Should these civilian aid workers be allowed to roam around, what is after-all a war zone?

2/ Was it wise to attempt a rescue mission?

3/ Why is there such an outcry if one of their kind is either injured or killed, while in our hands?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
1. Aid workers should be free to go where they want. These are very brave people who volunteer to do aid work. If they didn't do it, people would die. To know you are literally saving lives everyday probably makes the dangers seem worth it.

2. Without knowing the circumstances it is impossible for any of us to say it was or it wasn't wise.

3. There is an outcry because we have supposedly gone there to help the Afghan people. If we instead kill or maim them, then our motivations are called into question.
I agree with Gromit that Aid workers should be free to go where they want to but with certain provisos .
A. They shouldn't put other peoples lives at danger whilst carrying out their work..
B. They shouldn't expect to be rescued as a right.
In the past many lives have been lost because of 1.and 2.

The same thing applies to people who put themselves in danger after being warned not to carry out certain missions. People like that yacht couple who are now in the hands of Somali pirates.
God bless aid workers. If I had a small portion of their humanity I would be proud.
-- answer removed --
Civillian aid workers like her are far braver that all the soldiers you so admireAOG

These are people who go into very dangerous areas without weapons or defence

You don't hear aid workers moan about having to use lightly protected landrovers instead of huge armoured personnel carriers.

And they do it not because they've joined up with the hope of glory and adventure but rather to actually help some of the poorest people in the world who are trapped in the middle of a war not of their making.

Shame on you. You should be saluting her bravery not questioning her wisdom
Nicely put Jake..
Why do you hate soldiers so much Jake? You always seem to be whinging about them.
Jake do you think we should have sent a bunch of unarmed aid workers instead of the U.S and the British Army to solve the terrorist trouble then?
Starting to look like she was actually killed by the US rescue team who lobbed in a grenade - why the hell you would ever allow the yanks to mount a rescue is beyond me.

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Sad news.

Answer Question >>