"bednobs, no doubt the database has those reporting burglaries etc, I'm talking about the crimes where the reporters I'd is totally irrelevant. They are merely doing their civic duty and couldn't care less what plod actually does, they just want to have a clear concience about reporting the crime"
But the article dosen't say what percentage are people reporting cries against them, and what percentage are just reporting crimes in general, so your "obsessed" argument becomes flawed. Crimestoppers is anonymously available for those who want to report crimes not against them but in general. I am now trying to think of any circumstances when i have called the police to report a crime where it has not been against me, and i have never done it. Perhaps the databse is 99.9% full of people who have reported crimes against themselves and therefore needed to leave their name and address. With that spin, it now looks like it is you who are obsessed, not the police. You just cannot infer things that are not there in the article if your post is based on the article