Donate SIGN UP

Is it right for the press to publish photos of Jo's "alleged"killers

Avatar Image
Bobbisox | 14:24 Fri 21st Jan 2011 | News
41 Answers
Before it goes to Trial,
What happened to innocent until proven otherwise?
The Dutch guy who was arrested yesterday 'allegedly' in connection with Jo's murder, has his face splashed all over the papers as did the Landlord of where she lived
Has the press over stepped the mark?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Piccy or not. Everyone who knows these people will automatically assume they did it.
Question Author
Afters doc ;-)
I thought at one time this would have been classed as sub judice, so this doesn't count?
Question Author
I wasn't sure this was allowed SB, must be wrong
Sorry I don't understand.


I remember when Matthew Kelly was accused of something (messing with kids I think). He was plastered all over the news and it turned out he was innocent. The poor guy never worked again.
That's exactly what I said! I don't think names or photos should be released until someone is found guilty.
I agree with Bobbi but can it be prevented? If someone go's to a friend or whomever and obtains the picture.

Is there a law to stop it.
its obviously not illegal though !
Matthew Kelly does a lot of stage acting now squarebear has won tons of awards as well so i think hes doing OK.
I don't think its a case of innocent till proven guilty in this country more like
guilty till proven innocent
Question Author
squarebear .....Sorry I don't understand.

I am totally of the same view as yourself SB and you too ljd
Question Author
I would have thought the PComission would have been given guidelines
so what is when it says, say on a TV debate
"We can't mention the persons name for legal reasons?"
Question Author
it must be ok Anne, yes zeee this seems to be the case now, a Kangaroo Court
This was discussed on Loose Women -almost word for word as the OP.
Must be a topical subject.
Its not right bit its not illegal.However I note futher to another thread yesterday which I posted on that ITV are now not reporting live from the Haque and made no mention of his name on News earlier - they were last night though.
don't forget when they had the landlord in the papers were full of it
ex pupil says he was dodgy
friend said he was weird
i never liked the man he looked at me in a strange way
not natural to live on you own , etc, etc
the only legal recourse is contempt of court. but the media are smarty pants at this and very savvy, or at least willing to send some lawyers to a tribunal and fork out a few thousand quid.

the courts would have to decide that the media/organisation has 'deliberately' prejudiced the outcome of a case. at this juncture they are just reporting that someone has been arrested and questioned, and they have given the name+some holiday snaps. its wrong of course, but they haven't really broken the law.
Question Author
yes, Dr, no matter what the outcome, mud sticks
Yeah this guy got his character last night as well -the media rightly have today reigned in.Wonder how many other 'pen' pictures they have up their sleeve in case anyone else is a suspect? They were reporting from the Haque pdq last night -wonder if they have an OB in Sheffield on standby? Its a nonsence but hey we all watch it and comment on it !
Mud sticks in all walks of life -its human nature although not human nature at is best.
Question Author
thanks for clarifying this Ankou
No problem.

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is it right for the press to publish photos of Jo's "alleged"killers

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.