Perhaps not so far. But using religion as an excuse means one law for some citizens and another for others. It's not right. Sauce for one should be sauce for all.
Sikhs are great people and no danger to the public at all, it appears to be a local issue within a place of worship and of no public or police interest.
Why the hell were the police there then?
Men with blades storming a place of worship (storming anywhere actually) is definitely of interest to the police.
It doesn't seem to have anything to do with your link , mushroom.
Men entering a Sikh temple with bladed weapons and it is being treated as aggravated trespass?
What if these men are themselves Sikhs, are they not allowed to carry bladed weapons as part of their faith, and also enter their own place of worship?
Sikhs are always "armed" it's part of their religion and they have special dispensation to carry steel and as far as I can recall it has never caused a problem to the wider society.
Perhaps not so far. But using religion as an excuse means one law for some citizens and another for others. It's not right. Sauce for one should be sauce for all.
The kirpan (/kɪərˈpɑːn/; Punjabi: ਕਿਰਪਾਨ kirpān) is a sword or knife carried by Sikhs.[1] It is a religious commandment given by Guru Gobind Singh in 1699 that Sikhs must wear five articles of faith at all times, the kirpan being one of five articles.
Apparently the marriage was between a Hindu and Sikh.
A crime so bad that men from up and down the country felt they needed to get to the Temple and stop this heinous crime.