ChatterBank62 mins ago
Listener 4232 A Murder Mystery By Hedge-Sparrow
66 Answers
What a long preamble, but what a fun puzzle. It took me a few minutes to get what the down message was telling me, but the P D'd, all was clear. Thanks hedge-sparrow.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dr b. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Fantastic fun! I too, however, appear to be failing at finding the weapon. Well, I have one (and only one) which I'm not convinced by... And the "When you've got it you'll know" comment made earlier isn't overly encouraging... Curse these final steps! Tempted just to plump for it anyway, since the weapon I've found does match up to all of Hedge-sparrow's stipulations.
Another one for the 'everything but the weapon' group here. I wish they'd specified the number of letters for this, as they've done with several crosswords recently.
Is it a "weapon" in the usual sense of the word? The only remotely possible thing I can find is only 3 letters, so I doubt if that's correct.
Grrr.
Is it a "weapon" in the usual sense of the word? The only remotely possible thing I can find is only 3 letters, so I doubt if that's correct.
Grrr.
-- answer removed --
Like some others, it took me far longer to find the weapon than fill the grid! I had even gone through the process of decoding (and encoding) the entire grid just in case. Now having found it, I can't help but feel a little disappointed.
However, as a word of encouragement to anyone still struggling with the last bit and having more tenacity than simply to throw the whole thing in the bin, keep going! You will know it's the correct weapon when you find it.
However, as a word of encouragement to anyone still struggling with the last bit and having more tenacity than simply to throw the whole thing in the bin, keep going! You will know it's the correct weapon when you find it.
-- answer removed --
Quite enjoyed it, though like others it took me ages to find the weapon. A few question marks though - 13a gives a choice of extra letters (surely it should be embedded in the fodder rather than next to it), and I'm not sure it is very cohesive thematically - e.g. it doesn't seem to refer to a specific detective story, and the coding isn't relevant.
Also took me forever to find the weapon. Yet, having now found it with some confidence, I don't see how it is any more justifiable than some of the red herrings previously mentioned. I even have a potential candidate of equal length (in a goofy, though symmetric and rubric-conforming, configuration) that would seem to have a more logical connection with the murderer. I don't see how JEG could accept one but not the others.
Fun puzzle that could be improved with a more thought-out approach to the weapon.
Fun puzzle that could be improved with a more thought-out approach to the weapon.
Finally found the weapon yesterday while sitting at an airport (good use of time, if arguably a bad place to find a weapon!). Like others, slightly niggled at the obscurity of it - would actually have felt slightly better had the detective been one of the other two - but I can still remember (just) how much I enjoyed the original "evidence in the grid", so overall a lovely puzzle. Thanks Hedge-Sparrow.
To Cloverjo, I don't think your choice of APKTJS really fits detective C's reference (though it does fit another detective's comment) but there is another group of 4 letters that does. Hedgesparrow has included stuff in the grid to partially support every detective's conclusions, though as far as I can see there is only one murder victim.
I'm also struggling to find a murder weapon. Without some indication of length the whole process becomes a bit of an unsatisfying guessing game. I have two items (one obscure) that could have been conceivably used, depending on their size. If, as some have suggested, the answer is obscure, then I'm not sure that I want to waste any more time on it. In addition, the ambiguities in the word "touching" open up a minefield, as does the possibility of an encoded weapon (though that would strike me as unfair without any preamble confirmation).
I'm also struggling to find a murder weapon. Without some indication of length the whole process becomes a bit of an unsatisfying guessing game. I have two items (one obscure) that could have been conceivably used, depending on their size. If, as some have suggested, the answer is obscure, then I'm not sure that I want to waste any more time on it. In addition, the ambiguities in the word "touching" open up a minefield, as does the possibility of an encoded weapon (though that would strike me as unfair without any preamble confirmation).
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.