Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Cancer Cure Within 10 Years?
29 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Zacs-Master. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Eddie, not sure you've read the article but it does say 'The researchers are even working on a computer made from DNA which could live inside cells and look for faults in bodily networks, like cancer. If it spotted cancerous chances it would reboot the system and clear out the diseased cells.'
I think that goes for all diseased cells.
I think that goes for all diseased cells.
I’m sure Microsoft will complete that task within the ten years. They will first release a beta version in which they will not listen to any feedback then once sure it is fully copyrighted complete with bugs, tracking software and various apps they then release to public. There will be numerous updates and within twelve months they will release SP1 .
Being controversial here - but do you think that there are some conditions (not necessarily cancer) but say the common cold that cures have been found, but the financial impact on profits for the drug companies on cold remedies and other associated products are so great that they are keeping a lid on it. Just my 2p worth.
Interestingly, the earliest human cancer has recently been discovered in a 1.7 million year old bone. That b.....d disease has been around for a very long time!
http:// news.na tionalg eograph ic.com/ 2016/07 /oldest -human- cancer- disease -origin s-tumor -fossil -scienc e/
http://
"... do you think that there are some conditions ... that cures have been found, but the financial impact on profits for the drug companies on cold remedies and other associated products are so great that they are keeping a lid on it?"
No.
* * *
I don't think this will work in ten years either, but then again I don't think I'd ever be more pleased about being wrong. Best of luck to them, and even if the bold aim of total success is missed then that could still represent a huge breakthrough in cancer treatments.
No.
* * *
I don't think this will work in ten years either, but then again I don't think I'd ever be more pleased about being wrong. Best of luck to them, and even if the bold aim of total success is missed then that could still represent a huge breakthrough in cancer treatments.
As recently claimed where?
But anyway, it's a misunderstanding to imply that such-and-such a thing "causes cancer", or that not doing that activity or eating that product therefore doesn't. There's always an underlying risk that random malignant mutations would occur, and there's always a reason to suppose that the more damage is done to cells (by, say, smoking) could have an effect on the rate of such mutations or the chance of them occurring. The healthiest person on the planet could still get cancer and be horribly unlucky; some chain smokers who drink a huge amount while piling on the pounds or standing next to a pile of uranium might never get cancer at all.
It stands to reason that you want to minimise your chances of "winning" the cancer lottery, and reduce or avoid entirely the aggravating factors.
But anyway, it's a misunderstanding to imply that such-and-such a thing "causes cancer", or that not doing that activity or eating that product therefore doesn't. There's always an underlying risk that random malignant mutations would occur, and there's always a reason to suppose that the more damage is done to cells (by, say, smoking) could have an effect on the rate of such mutations or the chance of them occurring. The healthiest person on the planet could still get cancer and be horribly unlucky; some chain smokers who drink a huge amount while piling on the pounds or standing next to a pile of uranium might never get cancer at all.
It stands to reason that you want to minimise your chances of "winning" the cancer lottery, and reduce or avoid entirely the aggravating factors.
Naomi, Johns Hopkins seem to think so. See the paragraph 'Can your results help explain what causes cancer?'
http:// www.hop kinsmed icine.o rg/news /media/ release s/bad_l uck_of_ random_ mutatio ns_play s_predo minant_ role_in _cancer _study_ shows
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.