News11 mins ago
What Is The Most Incredible Scientific Fact You Have Ever Heard?
What is the most incredible scientific fact you have ever heard?
This is mine:
The LHC accelerates a clump of protons equivalent to a teaspoon of hydrogen gas at standard atmospheric pressure and temperature to a speed where it has the same kinetic energy as a TGV train travelling at over 200 kph.
This is mine:
The LHC accelerates a clump of protons equivalent to a teaspoon of hydrogen gas at standard atmospheric pressure and temperature to a speed where it has the same kinetic energy as a TGV train travelling at over 200 kph.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by beso. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Male sperm wales sing to attract mates.
As the mating season progresses, all males eventually end up singing exactly the same song which they all learn from hearing it from each other, and by the end of the season, the song has changed out of all recognition from how it started, but all the males still sing the same song.
As the mating season progresses, all males eventually end up singing exactly the same song which they all learn from hearing it from each other, and by the end of the season, the song has changed out of all recognition from how it started, but all the males still sing the same song.
some ABers ARE human ....
NO OK - Niels Bohr - I am interested in statements where the statement and its opposite are true at the same time
(wreaks havoc with logic)
or the statement that Einstein wasnt much good at maff - ( he was assigned Bose to help him)
or Moseley ( he of the street in Manch) was on the verge of describing neutrons in 1915 by considering the difference between atomic number and atomic weight - - but was killed in the trenches
NO OK - Niels Bohr - I am interested in statements where the statement and its opposite are true at the same time
(wreaks havoc with logic)
or the statement that Einstein wasnt much good at maff - ( he was assigned Bose to help him)
or Moseley ( he of the street in Manch) was on the verge of describing neutrons in 1915 by considering the difference between atomic number and atomic weight - - but was killed in the trenches
jim; My understanding, (which isn't profound) is that first you need to define what you mean by "particle" before you can speak of it (Bohr) or begin measurement. Then we need to reference who and where is the observer at this precise moment in time.
The common inference is, to use a simple analogy, that we can be standing next to, and looking at a snooker table and the pink ball is in both of two pockets at the same moment, and this isn't true.
The common inference is, to use a simple analogy, that we can be standing next to, and looking at a snooker table and the pink ball is in both of two pockets at the same moment, and this isn't true.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.