ChatterBank2 mins ago
What Is The Most Incredible Scientific Fact You Have Ever Heard?
What is the most incredible scientific fact you have ever heard?
This is mine:
The LHC accelerates a clump of protons equivalent to a teaspoon of hydrogen gas at standard atmospheric pressure and temperature to a speed where it has the same kinetic energy as a TGV train travelling at over 200 kph.
This is mine:
The LHC accelerates a clump of protons equivalent to a teaspoon of hydrogen gas at standard atmospheric pressure and temperature to a speed where it has the same kinetic energy as a TGV train travelling at over 200 kph.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by beso. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It may come down to a matter of interpretation. So far as I now, there hasn't been -- and never will be -- an experiment where something is literally observed to be in two places at once, but there are plenty of experiments which rely on the principle of superposition, ie that a particle can exist in multiple states at the same time, until a measurement is performed. This includes being in multiple places at once. The principle is well-tested, so now it comes down to interpretation. Is it a mathematical trick, other parallel universes interfering with our own, the wavefunction permeating space and collapsing only on a measurement?
Regardless, if you're still stuck on "what Bohr said", then it's also worth exploring the wonders of the last 90 years or so of Quantum Mechanics.
Regardless, if you're still stuck on "what Bohr said", then it's also worth exploring the wonders of the last 90 years or so of Quantum Mechanics.
Jim360 says ' "Electrons and protons have equal and opposite charges" has got to be quite an amazing one.'
I could live with that, but "The electron has the same charge as the sum of three quarks having 2/3, 2/3, and -1/3 of its charge" blows my mind. Perhaps there is something in the Koide formula after all, perhaps extended to include neutrinos, to indicate that electrons aren't fundamental?
I could live with that, but "The electron has the same charge as the sum of three quarks having 2/3, 2/3, and -1/3 of its charge" blows my mind. Perhaps there is something in the Koide formula after all, perhaps extended to include neutrinos, to indicate that electrons aren't fundamental?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.