ChatterBank1 min ago
Congrats To The Nobel Prize For Physics Winners......
55 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/s cience- environ ment-54 420240
It was a long time coming for Sir Roger, physics legend, well deserved.
It was a long time coming for Sir Roger, physics legend, well deserved.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.eurovision politics - - it does ( exist )
well done Penrose and well done me for getting it right this time after yesterdays gaffe over vaccines
I checked
and why is there no Nobel for Maff ? Mrs Nobel was kissing the local maff fella behind the bike shed.
Pas de Nobel moolah for mathematicians
Yeah and Frau Nobel shrieked when she was found out - zad eez why you are called NoBel coz you haff no b---!
how crude and unEnglish - so unladylike
An Mme Curie - she pushed Pierre under a carriage actually he might have jumped because the local maff man LaGrange was slipping her a Lagrangian (*) every now and then. every day more like
a lagrangian is a matrix useful in advanced mechanics - where er fings move to and fro
too much detail
well done Penrose and well done me for getting it right this time after yesterdays gaffe over vaccines
I checked
and why is there no Nobel for Maff ? Mrs Nobel was kissing the local maff fella behind the bike shed.
Pas de Nobel moolah for mathematicians
Yeah and Frau Nobel shrieked when she was found out - zad eez why you are called NoBel coz you haff no b---!
how crude and unEnglish - so unladylike
An Mme Curie - she pushed Pierre under a carriage actually he might have jumped because the local maff man LaGrange was slipping her a Lagrangian (*) every now and then. every day more like
a lagrangian is a matrix useful in advanced mechanics - where er fings move to and fro
too much detail
and why readers does each Nobel not get a knighthood from her maj?
about half turn it down
and the Mandarins who dole them out and covet these honours themselves dont like to hear 'no thanks'
Fred Hoyle was repeatedly turned down for a Nobel because he gave them a kicking for not including Jocelyn Bell Burnett in the prise for quasar discovery
and her contribution was - - - she discovered them and her supervisors got the Nobel
because they realised the importance ?
no - she had to tell them
it was because she was a woman
somewhat forgiving scientist who verged on the holy - "I havent had a bad career as the woman who ought to have got a Nobel"
about half turn it down
and the Mandarins who dole them out and covet these honours themselves dont like to hear 'no thanks'
Fred Hoyle was repeatedly turned down for a Nobel because he gave them a kicking for not including Jocelyn Bell Burnett in the prise for quasar discovery
and her contribution was - - - she discovered them and her supervisors got the Nobel
because they realised the importance ?
no - she had to tell them
it was because she was a woman
somewhat forgiving scientist who verged on the holy - "I havent had a bad career as the woman who ought to have got a Nobel"
and in the 'drivel' I have managed to name
The founder ( er Nobel that is!) Mme Curie ( first winner before her PhD actually - counts two )
Pierre her husband another nobel
two unnamed thesis supervisors who got a nobel for quasars - Hewish and Ryle
so that is five
and two also rans - Hoyle and Bell
gold plated drivel I say!
oh and TTT - yes you squeezed out - - one
The founder ( er Nobel that is!) Mme Curie ( first winner before her PhD actually - counts two )
Pierre her husband another nobel
two unnamed thesis supervisors who got a nobel for quasars - Hewish and Ryle
so that is five
and two also rans - Hoyle and Bell
gold plated drivel I say!
oh and TTT - yes you squeezed out - - one
fictional? - none of this is fiction TTT
it is science fact !
in fact lagrange points will exist in any suitable collection of objaaaayz obeying an inverse square law innit?
( electrostatics, electromagnetics)
so it is a fact of life of a field and not of an object or physical phenomenon
Jim - where are you?
it is science fact !
in fact lagrange points will exist in any suitable collection of objaaaayz obeying an inverse square law innit?
( electrostatics, electromagnetics)
so it is a fact of life of a field and not of an object or physical phenomenon
Jim - where are you?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.