ChatterBank1 min ago
How Long Does The Severn Flow.
31 Answers
How long in time (not distance) does it take a river like the Severn to flow from its source to the sea? Of course, this is impossible to answer: some molecules will travel faster than others; some may evaporate; the river may flow faster when in spate. However, there must be a rough answer for how soon one millilitre will reach the bar (no pub jokes, please) after a litre of water is released at the source.
Answers
River flow speeds are typically somewhere between 0 and 3 metres per second. So if you assume 1 m/s as a reasonable average (since I only care about order of magnitude), then it would take roughly four days for something to go from the Severn's source to its mouth. I'd assume that (roughly) double this is the correct upper limit. So the correct range is around...
09:10 Thu 04th Nov 2021
I have walked with a friend, its banks from the Severn bridge to its source up on Plynlimon, N.Wales & then back down the Wye - both sources are but a stone's throw apart - to the Severn bridge again, two days at a time, once a year staying the first night in a variety of interesting pubs. It took us 20 years!
This is of no use whatsoever to your question, but I hoped you might find it interesting. :0)
This is of no use whatsoever to your question, but I hoped you might find it interesting. :0)
River flow speeds are typically somewhere between 0 and 3 metres per second. So if you assume 1 m/s as a reasonable average (since I only care about order of magnitude), then it would take roughly four days for something to go from the Severn's source to its mouth. I'd assume that (roughly) double this is the correct upper limit.
So the correct range is around three to eight days, where I'd tend towards the higher value. I don't think anyone could improve on this without actually doing an experiment with eg some handy (non-toxic!) dye or some such.
So the correct range is around three to eight days, where I'd tend towards the higher value. I don't think anyone could improve on this without actually doing an experiment with eg some handy (non-toxic!) dye or some such.
Rivers though, don't flow at the same speed throughout their journey, where it widens it slows, where it narrows it flows faster.
But the most interesting thing said about rivers was by Heraclitus circa 500 BC;
"No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man."
and it's not he same river we walked, but I have many happy memories of it anyway.
But the most interesting thing said about rivers was by Heraclitus circa 500 BC;
"No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man."
and it's not he same river we walked, but I have many happy memories of it anyway.
sorry jim, but you can't extrapolate one from t'other;
https:/ /www.wo rldatla s.com/a rticles /which- are-the -fastes t-river s-in-th e-world .html
https:/
// "No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man."//
big thing for the Athenians - they did the bit about take a plank of the sacred ship Paralios and replace it wiv new - do and do again
At the end you have two ships, which one is the paralios
now my dears I am surprised no one has goggled speed of the severn which is 8 to 13 mph - 3.5-6 m/s
so it is about double Jims
Now the speed of the bore is 16 km / h and sortta goes up
now if the speed of the river were greater than 16 then the bore wouldnt occur 4 m/s
and if the speed were 16 kph or 4 m/s then the bore would be a standing wave
ter daah didnt expect me to say that didja?
golly 354 km in length so 354/16 is 22 h
did anyone else get that ?
physics on the back of an envelope or
why dont penguins feet freeze are two good books
big thing for the Athenians - they did the bit about take a plank of the sacred ship Paralios and replace it wiv new - do and do again
At the end you have two ships, which one is the paralios
now my dears I am surprised no one has goggled speed of the severn which is 8 to 13 mph - 3.5-6 m/s
so it is about double Jims
Now the speed of the bore is 16 km / h and sortta goes up
now if the speed of the river were greater than 16 then the bore wouldnt occur 4 m/s
and if the speed were 16 kph or 4 m/s then the bore would be a standing wave
ter daah didnt expect me to say that didja?
golly 354 km in length so 354/16 is 22 h
did anyone else get that ?
physics on the back of an envelope or
why dont penguins feet freeze are two good books
While that's true, Khandro, if you'll notice my earlier answer, I didn't extrapolate anything. I simply said that a typical average river speed is about one metre per second. Ergo, any river water starting out its 354km-long journey along the Severn can be expected to take around 354,000 seconds, or a little over four days.
Of course, this is too precise, so I then varied by assuming that 1m/s average is an upper limit for the average speed of the river, and that 0.5m/s is a reasonable lower limit for the average. This gives a range of four to eight days, which I then quoted as three to eight in case 1m/s is too low. I could as well have said "about a week", but the main point is that I've established with reasonable confidence that it doesn't take weeks for water to travel along the Severn, and it doesn't take mere hours either. This is Fermi Estimation, in case you're interested.
The Mississippi is, of course, a different river, but it's reasonable to assume that most rivers are fairly similarly behaved, as a first approximation. In that case, the fact that it takes water in a river ten times as long as the Severn a shade over ten times longer to travel its length than my upper estimate *supports* the initial estimate, rather than undermines it! Two different estimation techniques have led to the same answer. Pretty good going, in my book, for somebody who knows more or less nothing about rivers.
Of course, this is too precise, so I then varied by assuming that 1m/s average is an upper limit for the average speed of the river, and that 0.5m/s is a reasonable lower limit for the average. This gives a range of four to eight days, which I then quoted as three to eight in case 1m/s is too low. I could as well have said "about a week", but the main point is that I've established with reasonable confidence that it doesn't take weeks for water to travel along the Severn, and it doesn't take mere hours either. This is Fermi Estimation, in case you're interested.
The Mississippi is, of course, a different river, but it's reasonable to assume that most rivers are fairly similarly behaved, as a first approximation. In that case, the fact that it takes water in a river ten times as long as the Severn a shade over ten times longer to travel its length than my upper estimate *supports* the initial estimate, rather than undermines it! Two different estimation techniques have led to the same answer. Pretty good going, in my book, for somebody who knows more or less nothing about rivers.
I should of course say that I didn't extrapolate anything *from the Mississippi* in my first answer. I just used a fact, readily available from the internet, that water speed on rivers ranges from about 0m/s to about 3m/s, and assumed that river water tended to spend more time moving slower than faster.
Peter Pedant
//big thing for the Athenians - they did the bit about take a plank of the sacred ship Paralios and replace it wiv new - do and do again
At the end you have two ships, which one is the paralios//
Think you'll find they pinched that idea from Only Fools & Horses, pp.
Time is a man made construct, innit, jim?
//big thing for the Athenians - they did the bit about take a plank of the sacred ship Paralios and replace it wiv new - do and do again
At the end you have two ships, which one is the paralios//
Think you'll find they pinched that idea from Only Fools & Horses, pp.
Time is a man made construct, innit, jim?
I remember from a few years ago when there were floods in Bewdley and Worcester , an Environment Agency spokesman was being interviewed on Midlands Today (regional tv ) . He said that it takes about 72 hours for heavy rains in the Welsh mountains to work their way down the river to the Midlands . This seems to back up Jim's estimate .
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.