ChatterBank3 mins ago
Water On Merury ?
25 Answers
Scientists now believe that water, exists in ice form on mercury, even though it is the closest planet to the sun.
So, is it therefore feasible that water can be found somewhere between the two extremes the may be able to support life
So, is it therefore feasible that water can be found somewhere between the two extremes the may be able to support life
Answers
It might be those extreme conditions that kick started life. Shame they only think inside their scientific bubble. Life as we know it, here on Earth we find life where it shouldn’t be possible to exist.
09:39 Sat 04th Feb 2023
//Mercury has an extremely thin atmosphere which is made up of atoms blasted off its surface by the Solar wind, a constant stream of particles coming from the outer layer of the Sun. Because Mercury is so hot, these atoms quickly escape into space. Unlike the stable atmospheres of Earth and Venus, Mercury's atmosphere is constantly being replenished. //
https:/ /coolco smos.ip ac.calt ech.edu /ask/26 -Does-M ercury- have-an -atmosp here-
Definitely not a place for life as we know it.
https:/
Definitely not a place for life as we know it.
NASA describes it as an exosphere, rather than an atmosphere.
https:/ /solars ystem.n asa.gov /planet s/mercu ry/in-d epth/#: ~:text= Instead %20of%2 0an%20a tmosphe re%2C%2 0Mercur y,solar %20wind %20and% 20strik ing%20m eteoroi ds.
https:/
‘It might be those extreme conditions that kick started life. Shame they only think inside their scientific bubble’
Yes indeed, a shame that career scientists working for NASA have come to this conclusion. Much better for people on an Internet forum with no expertise in the subject to come to an alternative conclusion, eh?
Yes indeed, a shame that career scientists working for NASA have come to this conclusion. Much better for people on an Internet forum with no expertise in the subject to come to an alternative conclusion, eh?
//Does Mercury rotate. //
Yes it does. It is in 3:2 "captured rotation" or "tidal lock" with the Sun. It rotates on its axis three times (each taking 59 Earth days) for two orbits of the Sun (each taking 88 Earth days). So each of its "days" lasts two thirds of its "year".
The same is apparent with the Moon and the Earth. Those two bodies are locked (near enough) 1:1. The Moon takes 28 days to turn on its axis and also takes the same time to orbit the Earth. So the same part of the Moon is always facing the Earth, giving rise to the phrase "the dark side of the Moon" (even though it is not dark at all because it is exposed to the Sun).
These are no mere coincidences. The phenomenon occurs over time when the "tidal effect" of one rotating body on the other causes its rotation to slow until it is locked with its neighbour. It is usually the smaller of the two bodies which becomes locked though it can be both. Because of this effect the Earth's period of rotation on its axis is gradually slowing down and the Moon is gradually moving away from the Earth. There are other forces at play in this phenomenon but recent models show that the length of the Earth's day is increasing by about 1.8 milliseconds per century.
Yes it does. It is in 3:2 "captured rotation" or "tidal lock" with the Sun. It rotates on its axis three times (each taking 59 Earth days) for two orbits of the Sun (each taking 88 Earth days). So each of its "days" lasts two thirds of its "year".
The same is apparent with the Moon and the Earth. Those two bodies are locked (near enough) 1:1. The Moon takes 28 days to turn on its axis and also takes the same time to orbit the Earth. So the same part of the Moon is always facing the Earth, giving rise to the phrase "the dark side of the Moon" (even though it is not dark at all because it is exposed to the Sun).
These are no mere coincidences. The phenomenon occurs over time when the "tidal effect" of one rotating body on the other causes its rotation to slow until it is locked with its neighbour. It is usually the smaller of the two bodies which becomes locked though it can be both. Because of this effect the Earth's period of rotation on its axis is gradually slowing down and the Moon is gradually moving away from the Earth. There are other forces at play in this phenomenon but recent models show that the length of the Earth's day is increasing by about 1.8 milliseconds per century.
// ‘It might be those extreme conditions that kick started life. Shame they only think inside their scientific bubble’
Yes indeed, a shame that career scientists working for NASA have come to this conclusion. Much better for people on an Internet forum with no expertise in the subject to come to an alternative conclusion, eh? //
Maybe life does exist on Mercury, maybe it doesn't. But it seems at least the wrong place to focus your efforts and resources on looking, when Mars, Titan, Enceladus, Europa and so on. I suspect that's what NASA has in mind when it says "most likely too extreme" -- it's almost certainly not going to harbour life, so why prioritise looking there?
I do think that life, in one form or another, will likely exist wherever it's even remotely possible to do so, though. But it's not merely about being stuck inside a scientific bubble, it's also about where the most sensible place to start looking (and, for that matter, spend a lot of time, effort, money, and resources) will be. Mercury is not it.
Yes indeed, a shame that career scientists working for NASA have come to this conclusion. Much better for people on an Internet forum with no expertise in the subject to come to an alternative conclusion, eh? //
Maybe life does exist on Mercury, maybe it doesn't. But it seems at least the wrong place to focus your efforts and resources on looking, when Mars, Titan, Enceladus, Europa and so on. I suspect that's what NASA has in mind when it says "most likely too extreme" -- it's almost certainly not going to harbour life, so why prioritise looking there?
I do think that life, in one form or another, will likely exist wherever it's even remotely possible to do so, though. But it's not merely about being stuck inside a scientific bubble, it's also about where the most sensible place to start looking (and, for that matter, spend a lot of time, effort, money, and resources) will be. Mercury is not it.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.