Donate SIGN UP

Intelligently Designed Universe?

Avatar Image
Khandro | 08:36 Sun 01st Oct 2023 | Science
71 Answers

Intelligent design, as one sees it from a scientific point of view, seems to be quite real. This is a very special universe: it’s remarkable that it came out just this way. If the laws of physics weren’t just the way they are, we couldn’t be here at all. The sun couldn’t be there, the laws of gravity and nuclear laws and magnetic theory, quantum mechanics, and so on have to be just the way they are for us to be here.

Or what?

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 71rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

Design Is the controversial word here. It implies forethought has been used by someone / something to produce an end result. Intelligent evolution might be a better phrase, certainly in steering the debate away from the 'who did it then?' Question. 

But ....

//A team of astrophysicists based in Australia and England has uncovered evidence that the laws of physics are different in different parts of the universe. The report describes how one of the supposed fundamental constants of Nature appears not to be constant after all. Instead, this 'magic number' known as the fine-structure constant -- 'alpha' for short -- appears to vary throughout the universe.//

 

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100909004112.htm#:~:text=A%20team%20of%20astrophysicists%20based,to%20be%20constant%20after%20all.

 

I wonder if there might be more ....

But there might of been squillions of other universes that didn't work....might of just been luck that one did and survived

I was trying to avoid Khandro's comment 'If the laws of physics weren’t just the way they are'. It's a red herring, not only for the reason Naomi has pointed out but for the fact that the more we understand about physics (especially on a quantum level) the more we realise we don't actually know what the laws of physics are, or indeed whether there are any. 

So we're the WD40 of the universes, Bob 😂

Khandro, I hate to say it but I think you're on a loser with this one.

He's not if we can ignore design. The word will take us down the well trod 'creationist' path. But maybe that's what he wants?🥱

"Might have", Bob, not "might of". I think you do this deliberately. Mispronounceing is one thing but spelling it out on a keyboard is another. Don't tell us you didn't learn at skool?

Did you mean mispronouncing 10Cs?

God used to be the designer of humans and the Earth. He's now been relegated to designer of the universe. Those gaps are getting smaller, Khandro.

It's all the dark matter, radagast. 

Can we settle on 'the strong suggestions of physics'?

 

Going forward.

Yes. Typos are easily done, but typing "might of" instead of "might have" is a hardly a typo is it?

Just smile knowingly, 10CS, end've. 🤣

Might not 'of' been so bad if you hadn't written 'but spelling it out on a keyboard....' 10Cs 😂

Question Author

 

"The following gives a sense of the degree of fine-tuning that must go into some of these values to yield a life-friendly universe:

Gravitational constant: 1 part in 10^34

Electromagnetic force versus force of gravity: 1 part in 10^37

Cosmological constant: 1 part in 10^120

Mass density of universe:  1 part in 10^59

Expansion rate of universe: 1 part in 10^55

Initial entropy:  1 part in 10^ (10^123)

The last item in the list — the initial entropy of the universe — shows an astounding degree of fine-tuning. What all this shares is an incredible, astronomically precise, purposeful care and planning that went into the crafting of the laws and constants of the universe, gesturing unmistakably to intelligent design. As Nobel laureate in physics Charles Townes stated:"............ See the OP- which should have also been in quotation marks.

'purposeful care and planning'
 

all those figures are fine, but they're based on our perception of physics at this present point in scientific research. The creator theory, which you seem hell bent on perusing, is using the intelligence of the ancients in explaining the universe "it can't just have happened, there must be a God (or Gods)". 

//If the laws of physics weren’t just the way they are, we couldn’t be here at all.//

 

If the laws of physics differ in other areas of the universe, it follows that any life that might exist there probably couldn't exist in our bit.  Perhaps it's unwise to assume that all life is like us - or that it was all 'made' for beings like us.

Indeed, it's a very homocentric view

You're surely not suggesting that the Big Bang could ultimately result in the Big Poof as everything just vanishes, ZaM.

1 to 20 of 71rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Intelligently Designed Universe?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions