Could All Help With Signing My Petition
Seasonal1 min ago
I say no... almost everyone else i know says yes.
To me 0 is just a representation of the absence of a number...
You can not HAVE 0 of anything!!!
Well what do ppl think???
No best answer has yet been selected by mrbatfink. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I�m not going to be dragged into this, except to put you right on one point, mrbatfink.
In loosehead�s average calculation the zero most certainly did have an effect. The accepted method used to calculate mean averages is to add to values up and divide by n, the number in the count. Ignore the zero and the calculation would have been (4+5)/2 = 4.5 - completely wrong.
In arithmetic it is usually wise to accommodate all eventualities into the principle you are adopting, not just fit the principles to the values that you have. I don�t know what skills you learnt in order to practice electronic engineering. It seems that logic and reasoning were not amongst them. You should listen to your friends more.
Did you post this question to start a five minute argument, or are you going for the full half hour?
Four and a half hours after this 5-minute argument started, can I ask a question? (I have mathematics 'O' level only, I'm afraid, so not sure if I'm qualified to contribute.]
What about the positive effect of 0 as a number. You cannot have 10 or 100 without it, so what does it represent here - it's clearly not the absence of something.... or even the "representation of the absence of a number".
Help!