Donate SIGN UP

The big one

Avatar Image
steve @ home | 20:28 Sun 09th Apr 2006 | Science
11 Answers

Science v. religion.


who is right?

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 11 of 11rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by steve @ home. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Don't know. How about 2 falls, 2 submissions or a knockout to decide the winner? With apologies to Monty Python.
This is in essence, the reason v. faith debate. It amounts to what one chooses to base their beliefs on. I have committed myself to basing my beliefs on the knowledge of reality I am given automatically through perception. This has proved vastly more reliable than countless versions of reality I have been proffered by others.

If I can understand the relationship that further knowledge has to my perceptual experience, I then add this to my knowledge base. Otherwise I can not claim knowledge of it. This process has led me to a substantial understanding of what I am as a human being and my relationship to others and the world I live in.

For a question on AnswerBank . . . . . . . Free
For a pint of Irish Stout. . . . . . . . . . . . . .�2.50
For an Easter egg for the children . . . . . .�1.50 each
For Life, The Universe and Everything . . . Science

For everything else there is . . . . . . . . . . .Religion


(with apologies to Mastercard)


It's a daft question really anyway, because it's not a case of right or wrong.

They're totally different things, and should not be compared.

science is a religion!

Ladies and Gents, based on the two previous answers I'd say we have us a debate!
This is the "science" part of the website, so you probably won't find much people here to say religion is right...
Anyway, to know who is right, ask yourself what religion is based on, and what science is based on...
I personally believe in the flying spaghetti monster.
As do all rational people, Space. ;-)
Science of course!

For those who want to advance our race there is science.


For those who want to live in the dark ages there is religion.


I admit we might 'advance' ourselves into construction of new ways of killing ourselves but at least we had the guts to try new stuff and expand our minds.


Or we can sit at home, be really scared of everything, not understand anything and claim 'god won't let me think for myself'.


Give me free-thinking scientific heathens anytime - a much nicer bunch of people.


Anyway, this is a science topic strand - get religion questions out of here. Move it to the 'History and Myths' topic.


There is no comparison between science and religion so the question should not even arise.


AlphaMale

Question Author

Thanks everyone for your thoughts.


How about this one;


Richard Dawkins v. L Ron Hubbard...

1 to 11 of 11rss feed

Do you know the answer?

The big one

Answer Question >>