Crosswords3 mins ago
Evolution's neurological progression
10 Answers
What kind of impact has evolution had on the human brain in the last, say 100,000 years? Did it ever follow a linear progression? Thanks in advance! -nd
Answers
1 to 10 of 10
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by nucleardream. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Apparently not linear, according to this article.
The correlation between brain size and intelligence isn't so much what I was asking as is what the evolution in cognitive growth the brain has experienced in the recent past.
The brain is a fascinating complexity and I wonder to what neurological extent has it changed (if any) since the inauguration of the current human species.
I understand current thought alludes to species evolving in "leaps," as if a species "jumps" to a higher plateau of biological and psychological advancement and basically stays there until the next leap.
I may have just answered my own question...any other thoughts?
The brain is a fascinating complexity and I wonder to what neurological extent has it changed (if any) since the inauguration of the current human species.
I understand current thought alludes to species evolving in "leaps," as if a species "jumps" to a higher plateau of biological and psychological advancement and basically stays there until the next leap.
I may have just answered my own question...any other thoughts?
Is nt this the core topic in courses like physical anthropology, and human evoution
such as the answer is not a few lines but more like a term of lecctures ?
The problem is limited: Homo sapiens sapiens can't change too much without becoming another species.
100 000 y in human evolution is not a long period (pleistocene) I thought we were the same 100 000 y ago - four generation in 100 y which means 4000 generations which I thought was peanuts in terms of evolution
such as the answer is not a few lines but more like a term of lecctures ?
The problem is limited: Homo sapiens sapiens can't change too much without becoming another species.
100 000 y in human evolution is not a long period (pleistocene) I thought we were the same 100 000 y ago - four generation in 100 y which means 4000 generations which I thought was peanuts in terms of evolution
The problem with human evolution is that it would be nice is
A gave way to B which evolved into Austrolpithecus and then into Man (H Sapiens)
The fossil record doesnt bear this out - I think 100 000 we were co-exisitng with neandethals
Raymond Dart prof of anat in Witswatersrand was big in this - he desribed the Taung Child 1928 - australopithecus.
They apparently went back to him just before his death around 1960 and said did you find in your strata parallel species or changing one into the other ?
and he said apparently even in 1928 it was obvious they were co-existing but they thought no-one would believe them.....
A gave way to B which evolved into Austrolpithecus and then into Man (H Sapiens)
The fossil record doesnt bear this out - I think 100 000 we were co-exisitng with neandethals
Raymond Dart prof of anat in Witswatersrand was big in this - he desribed the Taung Child 1928 - australopithecus.
They apparently went back to him just before his death around 1960 and said did you find in your strata parallel species or changing one into the other ?
and he said apparently even in 1928 it was obvious they were co-existing but they thought no-one would believe them.....
god no wonder you are confused:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hominidae
seems to written by someone in the know, and the overall message seems to be - we dont have the first idea !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hominidae
seems to written by someone in the know, and the overall message seems to be - we dont have the first idea !
1 to 10 of 10
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.