As usual in the descriptive debate concerning human life, jake, there's little if any meaningful dialogue exchanged between the opposing sides. So, we'll just have to agree to disagree... without being disagreeable. Your poin(s) may be well taken and I can't address every conceivable counter idea you so well put forth, except that it has only been a few years, at most, ago, that the experts in the field stated categorically that advances in the science of regrowing human tissue could only be achieved with the use of embryonic stem cells and promoting of creating thousands of additional lines of such human embryos expressley for experimentation.
My point is simply that it's exciting such advances as reported by our Editor-in-Chief have been made (and many more, here in the U.S) without the use of embryos... and that's a good thing, no?
It is interesting, nevertheless, that the current poll question deals pointedly with this very subject.... so I would expect that AB Editor-inChief finds our discussion at least, debateable amongst the larger population.