News3 mins ago
Microsoft Lifecam Hd-3000 Camera!
4 Answers
If anyone is thinking of buying one of these then,DON'T-DO NOT BUY THIS CAMERA!
It is still being sold as 'compatible' with windows Ten,which it is, up to version 1607, but as soon as you update to the Fall Creators update 1709, it gets wiped off your system! You can then shove it in a drawer and wait for a 'patch' from Microsoft or buy another camera that doesn't rely on Bill Gates' stuff! How much faith can you have in a firm that can't even support its own products ,on its own systems?
If someone can suggest an alternative ,reliable replacement I shall be obliged.
Cheers
It is still being sold as 'compatible' with windows Ten,which it is, up to version 1607, but as soon as you update to the Fall Creators update 1709, it gets wiped off your system! You can then shove it in a drawer and wait for a 'patch' from Microsoft or buy another camera that doesn't rely on Bill Gates' stuff! How much faith can you have in a firm that can't even support its own products ,on its own systems?
If someone can suggest an alternative ,reliable replacement I shall be obliged.
Cheers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Grandpappy. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.See the reply here about running it in compatibility mode
https:/ /answer s.micro soft.co m/en-us /window s/forum /window s_10-ha rdware- winpc/i s-lifec am-hd-3 000-com patible -with-w indows- 10/2848 02ba-b7 0c-4163 -a854-0 330e9f1 48f4
https:/
I don't think the quality of the camera is the issue here! It's the principle of being 'ripped off' and the fact that Microsoft
has acknowledged as much by offering solutions ,that the customer then has to attempt,only to discover that the product, bought in good faith, is not 'fit for purpose'.
Surely that's the manufacturers responsibility?
has acknowledged as much by offering solutions ,that the customer then has to attempt,only to discover that the product, bought in good faith, is not 'fit for purpose'.
Surely that's the manufacturers responsibility?