News1 min ago
Another Belter From The Judiciary!
50 Answers
http://
Why can we not staff our system with people who are not so gullible?
Why can we not staff our system with people who are not so gullible?
Answers
Eddie, these seem to be facts from the article. I think if I had been a juror there would only be one conclusion: Ellie's mother Jennie Gray, [ ]has admitted perverting the course of justice by giving a false account of what she did on the day Ellie died. Jurors were told Mr Butler caused "catastrophi
20:44 Tue 19th Apr 2016
or Maria Coldwell .... yeah yeah I know 3T's hangers on are gonna pile in with one liners " Mary who what-well, who dat den ? "
Good luck Mikey - all cases are fused into one. Judges and juries referred to as "staff" so they can be slagged off ad lib as a corporate body (hem,hem).
,
yes it is another belter from 3 teeeeeee and pals !
Good luck Mikey - all cases are fused into one. Judges and juries referred to as "staff" so they can be slagged off ad lib as a corporate body (hem,hem).
,
yes it is another belter from 3 teeeeeee and pals !
here's a local news report from the time of the overturning of his 2007 conviction. whilst there's not too much detail, the reasons for the appeal being allowed are set out.
http://
http://
^^ Thanks very good link
I think that the contention that the Court of Appeal were 'gullible' can be discounted.
'' The court of appeal concluded that there was no rational basis on which a jury on the basis of the medical evidence given, could reject an unknown reason for injuries other than shaking''
''It also found the Judges summing up contained serious misdirection''
So the fault lies with the inadequate medical evidence and a poor summing up by the original Judge, rather than a 'Gullible' Court of appeal.
I think that the contention that the Court of Appeal were 'gullible' can be discounted.
'' The court of appeal concluded that there was no rational basis on which a jury on the basis of the medical evidence given, could reject an unknown reason for injuries other than shaking''
''It also found the Judges summing up contained serious misdirection''
So the fault lies with the inadequate medical evidence and a poor summing up by the original Judge, rather than a 'Gullible' Court of appeal.
Do you remember the 'Free George Davis/George Davis is innocent' campaign from the 1970's?
He was a known bank robber who was convicted, had his conviction quashed (because he didn't do it) and then went on to commit more bank robberies.
The judiciary have to deal with matters on a case-by-case basis and hindsight is always 20/20.
He was a known bank robber who was convicted, had his conviction quashed (because he didn't do it) and then went on to commit more bank robberies.
The judiciary have to deal with matters on a case-by-case basis and hindsight is always 20/20.
Latest Posts
Body & Soul10 mins ago
Are Labour Preparing To Dump The P M ?
News12 mins ago
Society & Culture15 mins ago
Crosswords16 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.