ChatterBank2 mins ago
The Rushing Tide Of Fascism ...
155 Answers
... is taking over this site. After years of copious quotes from Hitler's favourite English newspaper, we are now getting quotes from the far more odious Breibart website, a website which makes Attila the Hun look Liberal.
And they have the gall to suggest Islam is taking over - I haven't seen many quotes from Muslim sites here.
And they have the gall to suggest Islam is taking over - I haven't seen many quotes from Muslim sites here.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
To the many Islamophiles who have posted: I will happily give evidence for my (and other's) assertions that Islam is incompatible with Western democracy, that large Muslim populations in those democracies are a threat to those democracies and that Islam (the mainstream creed, not the nutters' version) is "fascist".
I don't need Breitbart and I certainly don't need the Daily Mail: I will do so by using quotes taken solely from the Islamic sources themselves. These are: (1) the Koran - the literal, unaltered and unerring word of God - this according to ALL mainstream Muslims, not just the nutters; (2) the sayings of the God's Apostle - the prophet Mohammed - viewed by ALL mainstream Muslims, not just the nutters, as the perfect model of piety and conduct; and (wait for it - and this is my killer argument (3) the life and actions of the "perfect" man Mohammed himself.
This is not an invitation to "debate" in the sneer and smart-*** comment style of AB's finest master debaters; it's invitation to listen to my arguments and then explain the logical or factual flaws in them. Or, alternatively, accept the validity of some of my claims, but point out why my extrapolations from them are wrong.
£100 to a charity of his or her choice to any Islamophile on this thread who meets this challenge and attempts an honest and informed criticism of my claims. This shouldn't be difficult, you don't need to know anything about Islam, for instance, because there are a thousand Saudi, Qatari and Iranian funded websites you can use which provide "refutations" of any criticism of Islam. (Google is your friend)
But I expect more from the AB Islamophile than what they'll find on any of those sites: honesty.
Forget the bottom-feeders, cut out the middle-man, let's start with you, Zac's Master. (Sorry if you see that as a slight, Ichkeria)
I don't need Breitbart and I certainly don't need the Daily Mail: I will do so by using quotes taken solely from the Islamic sources themselves. These are: (1) the Koran - the literal, unaltered and unerring word of God - this according to ALL mainstream Muslims, not just the nutters; (2) the sayings of the God's Apostle - the prophet Mohammed - viewed by ALL mainstream Muslims, not just the nutters, as the perfect model of piety and conduct; and (wait for it - and this is my killer argument (3) the life and actions of the "perfect" man Mohammed himself.
This is not an invitation to "debate" in the sneer and smart-*** comment style of AB's finest master debaters; it's invitation to listen to my arguments and then explain the logical or factual flaws in them. Or, alternatively, accept the validity of some of my claims, but point out why my extrapolations from them are wrong.
£100 to a charity of his or her choice to any Islamophile on this thread who meets this challenge and attempts an honest and informed criticism of my claims. This shouldn't be difficult, you don't need to know anything about Islam, for instance, because there are a thousand Saudi, Qatari and Iranian funded websites you can use which provide "refutations" of any criticism of Islam. (Google is your friend)
But I expect more from the AB Islamophile than what they'll find on any of those sites: honesty.
Forget the bottom-feeders, cut out the middle-man, let's start with you, Zac's Master. (Sorry if you see that as a slight, Ichkeria)
// Lordy lordy indeed. Which bit of this doesn't apply to Islam, ?
....the emphasis is on the group — the nation — with few individual rights. You must support the ruling party's views on society, politics, and culture — or else.//
the emphasis is on the group - erm no it about personal worship of God innit - you've read the Qoran Nigh - you should know
the nation - nope - unless there is a Nigh definition of nation - as in united in religion.
with few individual rights. - nope they have rights
you must support the ruling party's views - - nope - ruling party doesnt occur in the Qoran and the Prophet had an eentsy problem with rulers innit - precipitating his flight from mecca
politics, and culture - not qoranic concepts
The usual late Nigh speak .....
Gawd as someone used to say ....
....the emphasis is on the group — the nation — with few individual rights. You must support the ruling party's views on society, politics, and culture — or else.//
the emphasis is on the group - erm no it about personal worship of God innit - you've read the Qoran Nigh - you should know
the nation - nope - unless there is a Nigh definition of nation - as in united in religion.
with few individual rights. - nope they have rights
you must support the ruling party's views - - nope - ruling party doesnt occur in the Qoran and the Prophet had an eentsy problem with rulers innit - precipitating his flight from mecca
politics, and culture - not qoranic concepts
The usual late Nigh speak .....
Gawd as someone used to say ....
Pretty Precious arrives on cue.
Slavery, paedophilia and rape are obvious "populist" simple examples.
But the main one is centred on legal authority. Is the "sovereignty of the people" an Islamic concept? Or is Western democracy "fitnah" (can't remember the word, but Precious will put me right for sure) and therefore "making war on Allah and his Messenger". And what percentage of Europe's Muslims see it one way or a Western tolerant way?
Slavery, paedophilia and rape are obvious "populist" simple examples.
But the main one is centred on legal authority. Is the "sovereignty of the people" an Islamic concept? Or is Western democracy "fitnah" (can't remember the word, but Precious will put me right for sure) and therefore "making war on Allah and his Messenger". And what percentage of Europe's Muslims see it one way or a Western tolerant way?
Never mind Breitbart (sob,)
Even The Guardian is sick of Islam.
https:/
Even The Guardian is sick of Islam.
https:/
-- answer removed --
Spath, no. Canary, like many people here, fails to recognise fascism even when it's staring him in the face.
kvalidir , //I don't want people silenced, not at all, I do however want them to quote reputable news sources and not Stormfront.//
So silenced unless they use only sources that you approve of.
//we had three members leave over this//
I guess they too wanted to read only from sources they approved of. Should we placate by kowtowing? I don’t think so.
kvalidir , //I don't want people silenced, not at all, I do however want them to quote reputable news sources and not Stormfront.//
So silenced unless they use only sources that you approve of.
//we had three members leave over this//
I guess they too wanted to read only from sources they approved of. Should we placate by kowtowing? I don’t think so.
