Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Public Schools.
42 Answers
What makes Public Schools so successful, that they provide the movers and shakers of our society?
What is the secret?
What is the difference between, say, a geography lesson in Eton, and a geography lesson in Bash Street Comprehensive?
I never understand the garble from educational, "experts," when they appear on T.V.
What is the secret?
What is the difference between, say, a geography lesson in Eton, and a geography lesson in Bash Street Comprehensive?
I never understand the garble from educational, "experts," when they appear on T.V.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Our elder son was and still is more easily influenced than I think is good for him. In the local primary school he was not seen to do well although I am certain he is no less intelligent than the majority of the rest. Then we went to Africa and he went to a private English medium school - the contrast was stunning, his first report card dropped our jaws as we stood there anxiously, quickly scanning it while he mingled with his friends on last day. As a result we (a little but not very hesitatingly) sent him to a local private school once back in the UK. He did pretty well, as well as we hoped he would. His younger brother followed and did outstandingly well.
The difference was, in my view, very largely due to much higher levels of motivation among all the pupils, better upbringing - actually with a few different drawbacks (a few upstart, self indulgent spoilt brats with parents with "aspirations", one or two sadly lacking kids who were being given the best opportunity available (and why not, really)) but much less challenging in class. Overall I believe the atmosphere was healthier than too often in the state environment and, yes, probably to many eyes based on old values. The teachers were better and more motivated toward good results and they got them. Smaller class sizes undoubtedly helped. We worried about the stigma (inverted snobbery) even though this school never seemed to us to promote anything other than a reputation of good results (which they easily could justify). Educationally, we definitely made the right decision although we will never know how they would have fared in a state school.
The difference was, in my view, very largely due to much higher levels of motivation among all the pupils, better upbringing - actually with a few different drawbacks (a few upstart, self indulgent spoilt brats with parents with "aspirations", one or two sadly lacking kids who were being given the best opportunity available (and why not, really)) but much less challenging in class. Overall I believe the atmosphere was healthier than too often in the state environment and, yes, probably to many eyes based on old values. The teachers were better and more motivated toward good results and they got them. Smaller class sizes undoubtedly helped. We worried about the stigma (inverted snobbery) even though this school never seemed to us to promote anything other than a reputation of good results (which they easily could justify). Educationally, we definitely made the right decision although we will never know how they would have fared in a state school.
To clarify: The teachers were better because a school that pays better commands more attraction for teachers and can choose the best candidates. The working environment in private schools is more attractive on several levels. Teachers in such schools tend to work harder to keep their jobs because they can and sometimes are "let go" (maybe now more common in state school than it was). Having taught at a private school looks good on any other application, state or private.