"It's easy really. Female identifies as a male and starts the procedure. Decides to have a baby naturally (as natural as possible) and then will continue with his transition into a male. As a female he was sexually attracted to men. As a male he is still attracted to men which will make him gay." It's even easier than that - a woman has given birth to a child. Said...
Can I take it that you wouldn't object to this sort of thing if they paid for it, or is that just a thinly-veiled excuse behind which you can hide your bigotry, TheLand?
What expense are you talking about? From the small clip in the OP there was no mention of how anything has been paid for and giving birth doesn't count!
If I may, Pixie, I just wanted to say that while I wish you and I agreed about this I've never detected a hint of the sort of attitude from you that TheLand demonstrates. If only more disagreements were so good-natured.
Calling someone a freak no matter the circumstances is an attitude that should have long since disappeared. Even if you don't "accept" this person's identity they still have the right to the basic levels of respect required to see them as human.
Imo, calling anyone "a freak" is unacceptable. Each to their own... what i personally disagree with is the need for everyone else to lie and make way. People can do whatever they wish... providing it doesn't harm others. And I think, Jim, that is where we disagree x
//I don't feel sorry for a child who is obviously wanted and very well loved. I wish them all well.//
This woke poster has no idea whether the child is "obviously" wanted and far less "loved". Nor the ultimate well-being of this child.
The people who are experimenting with new family units are doing so using adopted babies as guinea pigs. And I despise those people who have demanded this experiment, and who have organised it and who have legislated for it.
That includes the disgusting pinniped AB claque which applauds this immoral nonsense.
VE, because the vast majority of babies born, are wanted. There are choices otherwise. I am not going to assume this was "mistake", as it does seem a deliberate decision.
Don't get me wrong though... I am never in favour of lying.
Also ,VE, I could well be wrong here... but didn't you also argue against abortion? Which means you are not that worried about unwanted babies. I apologise if I am wrong.
When a baby got killed by its father some years ago the BBC did not think it relevant 9or possibly not in the "public" interest) to point out that this was a baby adopted by two married homosexuals.
Did this sadly childless married couple adopt a baby because thet yearned for kids? Or because they were making a fashion statement?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.