Contd.
Look, I'm not trying to overwhelm you with meaningless excerpts, and I will admit to occasional hyperbole (so accused by my kids, as well) in descriptive terms (when I coined the term "huge cadre" something said to me that Waldo's gonna ask for a source. I think there's a probable reason that web sites as well as acquaintences (my own formal education is Geology) freely discuss the contention among professionals regarding the subject of speciation and inherent disagreement and the lack of a List of namesof such disagreers (is that a word?) and that being an unwillingness on their part to be so listed but a willingness to express their opinions in journals and articles...
Having said that, I repeat that you're probably aware of a larger "battle" to define the parameters of micro and macro that is generally acknowledged publicly,no?
Let me close with this:
""Eldredge and Gould not only showed that paleontologists had been out-of-step with biologists for decades, but also that they had unconsciously trying to force the fossil record into the gradualistic mode. The few supposed examples of gradual evolution were featured in the journals and textbooks, but paleontologists had long been mum about their 'dirty little trade secret:' most species appear suddenly in the fossil record and show no appreciable change for millions of years until their extinction."
Dr. Donald Prothero (Prothero, D.R. 1992. Punctuated Equilibrium At Twenty: A Paleontological Perspective)
"Attempts to detect adaptive evolution at the molecular level have met with little success."
Dr. Paul Sharp
"The results of molecular genetics have frequently been difficult to explain by conventional evolutionary theory"
Dr. J.A. Shapiro
Contd.