News3 mins ago
Scottish vs Scots
21 Answers
Ok, I know Scotch is a drink and not a person's nationality, but when do you use 'Scots' over 'Scottish' and vice versa, or are they interchangeable?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Whickerman. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
We never use Scotch in any termanology.
Scottish is not the term used in Scotland for our interpretation of English -as much as it pains (joke ;) we speak English with regional dialects.
If someone asks I say im Scottish-dont ever say Scot but may say I am a Scot.
Scotts porridge oats is a brand name -nowt to with being Scottish -its a surname.
Scottish is not the term used in Scotland for our interpretation of English -as much as it pains (joke ;) we speak English with regional dialects.
If someone asks I say im Scottish-dont ever say Scot but may say I am a Scot.
Scotts porridge oats is a brand name -nowt to with being Scottish -its a surname.
Some claim nowadays that ‘Scotch' should be used only in reference to whisky and perhaps certain foodstuffs such as Scotch Egg or in phrases like ‘Scotch mist'.
Regarding people, 'Scotch' was used as an adjective, regularly and quite happily, by Rabbie Burns as well as Sir Walter Scott, two of Scotland's major writers. The dislike some modern Scots have of the word in this context is really just based on a silly nationalistic affectation of the late 19th/early 20th centuries. There is no truly historical or etymological reason for ‘Scotch' to be considered demeaning or wrong at all.
However, nowadays it's just a harmless quirk with us Scots, so just humour us, but you're free to call ME a Scotchman if you like. If it was good enough for Rabbie, it's good enough for me!
Regarding people, 'Scotch' was used as an adjective, regularly and quite happily, by Rabbie Burns as well as Sir Walter Scott, two of Scotland's major writers. The dislike some modern Scots have of the word in this context is really just based on a silly nationalistic affectation of the late 19th/early 20th centuries. There is no truly historical or etymological reason for ‘Scotch' to be considered demeaning or wrong at all.
However, nowadays it's just a harmless quirk with us Scots, so just humour us, but you're free to call ME a Scotchman if you like. If it was good enough for Rabbie, it's good enough for me!
from Swots corner :
What is the difference between "Scotch" and "Scottish"?
(Fine shades of meaning)
Scots' preferred adjective for Scotland and for themselves is "Scots". "Scottish" is also acceptable. But "Scotch" (although used by Robert Burns and Sir Walter Scott, and still used by some Americans of Scots descent) is now considered offensive by many Scots. Certain Scots hold that only three things can be "Scotch": "Scotch whisky", "Scotch egg", and "Scotch mist". They are not interested in considering additions to this list, although many other terms containing "Scotch" can be found in dictionaries.
(extract from "Usage Disputes" by Mark Israel)
What is the difference between "Scotch" and "Scottish"?
(Fine shades of meaning)
Scots' preferred adjective for Scotland and for themselves is "Scots". "Scottish" is also acceptable. But "Scotch" (although used by Robert Burns and Sir Walter Scott, and still used by some Americans of Scots descent) is now considered offensive by many Scots. Certain Scots hold that only three things can be "Scotch": "Scotch whisky", "Scotch egg", and "Scotch mist". They are not interested in considering additions to this list, although many other terms containing "Scotch" can be found in dictionaries.
(extract from "Usage Disputes" by Mark Israel)
The point, as I mentioned earlier, Conleth, is that there is no REAL reason for considering Scotch offensive. Even The Oxford English Dictionary refers to (quote) "Scotch...falling into disuse...out of deference to the Scotsman's SUPPOSED dislike of it."
Clearly, the editors of that publication understand no more than I do just WHY it became 'offensive'.
Clearly, the editors of that publication understand no more than I do just WHY it became 'offensive'.
As Scots is a noun and Scottish is an adjective, then yes, Scots people is linguistically wrong - it's like saying 'Poles people' instead of 'Polish people' As far as Scotch v Scottish is concerned, as has been said, it doesn't make a lot of difference and only certain Scottish people (or Scots) seem to get upset by it. As far as the use of the word Scotch to describe beer in Northumberland, then yes, it became a generic name for a certain type of beer years ago, originating from McKewan's Best Scotch. Even when drinking Newcastle IPA we would ask for a pint of Scotch.