Some of the religious here claim that Atheism a religion and that Richard Dawkins is its God. I disagree with some of what Richard Dawkins says, so how do they conclude that he's my God?
Do you, the religious, ever disagree with your God?
Sandy, I can't help thinking God was a bit haphazard with his thunderbolts. Take poor old Uzzah, for example, presumably an obedient follower of his Lord. God decreed that no man should touch the Ark of the Covenant, but upon seeing it about to tumble from the cart it was being transported on, Uzzah stretched out his hand to steady it - and zapppp. Struck dead! There's gratitude for you! Some friend God turned out to be!
^ perhaps he should have used a stick or a gloved hand or perhaps a layer of dust on his hand even a film of perspiration might have saved him. A layer of dead epidermal cells?
I've often said it could be a grave mistake to anthropomorphise God. Uzzah's misfortune clearly shows that he isn't our friend. He sets the rules and we obey, or else.
That's as it should be.
Sandy, if god made us in his image doesn't that mean that it is reasonable for humans to anthropomorphise him just a little? or did he say that to all the creatures of his creation just to make them feel that little bit 'special'.
Birdie, I don't think we should dismiss God's treatment of the Bishop of Durham so lightly. I certainly don't think what happened was a coincidence or that my view is only 'confirmation bias'.
To unleash a thunderbolt at the chair when Jenkins spouted his heresy shows that God might even have a sense of humour. Though having said earlier that we shouldn't anthropomorphise him, maybe that would have been better left unsaid.
Jomifl, if we are made in Gods image he certainly isn't made in ours.
@Sandy - were your conjecture right, and David Jenkins was punished by God with a lightning bolt, what does that actually say about your God?
It says god has terrible aim, and cares far more about possible blasphemy than his representatives abusing children - seems pretty unpleasant and selfish behaviour to me...............
I don't see God as the NT 'Gentle Jesu, meek and mild...' In my minds eye he's Old Testament, playing with us for his own amusement, indifferent to our pain, as we wend our weary way through this vale of tears.
I was using 'chair' in the 'cathedra' sense, the Bishop's seat of authority. I was not trying to suggest that the bishop was there when the thunderbolt was dispatched.
On re-reading my 14:29 post I see a typo. "To unleash a thunderbolt at the chair WHEN", should read "WHERE".
It's ironic that Jenkins, in the role of Doubting Thomas, should have provoked such strong evidence of Gods dreadful power.
God works in mysterious ways...
not really if all he's got is thunderbolts. why didn't he send a plague of locusts down upon jenkins, they are still available for plaguing on demand aint they ? i mean if apollo can send plagues and famine, can't this other bloke ?
If anyone was visited by a plague of locusts these days the media might just put it down to a gardening problem. A thunderbolt leaves little room for doubt.