The thing is, birdie, that despite the name pre-planning and predetermination is not the same thing. Pre-planning requires something to exist that is able to plan a course to a desired goal, whereas predetermination merely says any control you have is illusionary and what unfolds next is an inevitable consequence of the existing state of things and unalterable.
Of your 4 possibilities, the first needs a large discussion on what the heck 'free will' is supposed to be. When I try to analyse it, it seems to be either the ability to come to a best decision outside of any influences but as an innate ability (which AI machines can already accomplish) or the more amazing, an ability to deliberately chose a less likely to be correct decision just for the heck of it. All very weird, and IMO seems unlikely.
Option two is about having limited 'free will' (whatever it is) within a determined framework. It seems to me to probably be a contradiction but I guess it depends on how one defines things.
Initially option three seems absurd but one could argue that outside events are truly random, merely seeming to be predetermined, and 'free will' is actually an illusion; so we are just along for the ride. That if we were able to return to a previous point in time and let time 'flow' again it could take a different path.
Option four seems most likely to me given the lack of evidence for 'free will'. Are we not all subject to how our brains are 'wired up' and the circumstances we find ourselves in, when we make decisions ? something we don't seem to have much control over since to have control over what gives us control would be like a machine creating itself from nothing. Why would option four not be the reasonable conclusion ?