Technology3 mins ago
Scientology
49 Answers
Do you think it's as dangerous and malevolent as the media report?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by NoMercy. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Re their Tax exempt status.
This comes back, I think, to their vast quantities of cash, and their litigious nature. They were actually stripped of their tax-exempt status in the US back in I think it was late 60s? - They then slapped the IRS with a blizzard of law suits, and regularly filed, went to court, lost - for decades - until the IRS finally caved in, because of the drain on their resources that defending all these lawsuits represented. So Scientology paid what was effectively a token fine/back payment in taxes, and in return were re-instated as a tax exempt body.
It is also important to recognise that they have an extensive PR machine that lobbies ceasely for Scientology to be recognised as a religion in all of the countries they operate in. Some countries they have been successful, others less so. France is a hostile envirnoment for them - they have been classified as a cult, and were recently fined nearly a million dollars for fraudulent behaviour.
In the UK they are not exempt from tax, but are exempt from VAT - they are recognised as a not for profit organisation, rather than a religion.Despite that, it is recognised as a religion by the Prison Service and the Armed Forces.
This comes back, I think, to their vast quantities of cash, and their litigious nature. They were actually stripped of their tax-exempt status in the US back in I think it was late 60s? - They then slapped the IRS with a blizzard of law suits, and regularly filed, went to court, lost - for decades - until the IRS finally caved in, because of the drain on their resources that defending all these lawsuits represented. So Scientology paid what was effectively a token fine/back payment in taxes, and in return were re-instated as a tax exempt body.
It is also important to recognise that they have an extensive PR machine that lobbies ceasely for Scientology to be recognised as a religion in all of the countries they operate in. Some countries they have been successful, others less so. France is a hostile envirnoment for them - they have been classified as a cult, and were recently fined nearly a million dollars for fraudulent behaviour.
In the UK they are not exempt from tax, but are exempt from VAT - they are recognised as a not for profit organisation, rather than a religion.Despite that, it is recognised as a religion by the Prison Service and the Armed Forces.
Blimey... all quite fascinating stuff really. I had always thought it was one of those faddy things that was popular now as obviously had some big name members but would fade away in to obscurity once people stopped being interested in Tom Crusie or John Travolta; it's clearly much bigger than that and malevolent seems the correct word for it.
Nasty stuff imo, NoM, systematically milking vulnerable people of their money by preying on their insecurities. And very agressive.
http://
http://
“Do you think it's as dangerous and malevolent as the media report?”
No. It's actually MORE dangerous than the media report it to be.
The media criticise Scientology whilst wearing kid gloves. They are aware of their litigious nature and very rarely run openly critical stories about the organisation. It is dangerous and highly sinister. It uses the law to silence and bankrupt its critics. It spreads falsehoods about its critics in an attempt to get the critical person or organisation to shut up. This practice is known as, 'Dead Agenting'* (often abbreviated to Dead Agent, DA or D/A).
Since I have posted this message in a public place, I expect that my username will now be on a Scientology database somewhere in Clearwater, Florida and I will be classified as a 'Suppressive Person'** or SP. This is not me being paranoid by the way – the Scientologists really are out to 'get' those who openly criticise it.
*
http://
**
http://
No. It's actually MORE dangerous than the media report it to be.
The media criticise Scientology whilst wearing kid gloves. They are aware of their litigious nature and very rarely run openly critical stories about the organisation. It is dangerous and highly sinister. It uses the law to silence and bankrupt its critics. It spreads falsehoods about its critics in an attempt to get the critical person or organisation to shut up. This practice is known as, 'Dead Agenting'* (often abbreviated to Dead Agent, DA or D/A).
Since I have posted this message in a public place, I expect that my username will now be on a Scientology database somewhere in Clearwater, Florida and I will be classified as a 'Suppressive Person'** or SP. This is not me being paranoid by the way – the Scientologists really are out to 'get' those who openly criticise it.
*
http://
**
http://
-- answer removed --
this article by John Sweeney doesn't make pleasant reading
http://www.dailymail....d-Scientologists.html
http://www.dailymail....d-Scientologists.html
Latest Posts
Crosswords11 mins ago
Tv Smart Free Tv Anyone Got One
Film, Media & TV13 mins ago
News14 mins ago