ChatterBank2 mins ago
Keeping R&S Civil
177 Answers
Afternoon.
We've noticed it's got a bit "rough" in here recently.
We'd like this section to be accessible to all without fear of being "ambushed" by members who simply disagree with them.
Please remember calling someone an idiot (or similar) is very unlikely to aid the changing of their perspective.
We're not asking you to change what you say - we're asking you to change the way you say it.
In other news: we now have a small "welcome box" between the "enter a question" box and the questions below. Suggestions welcome for things we could pop in there.
All the best,
Ed
We've noticed it's got a bit "rough" in here recently.
We'd like this section to be accessible to all without fear of being "ambushed" by members who simply disagree with them.
Please remember calling someone an idiot (or similar) is very unlikely to aid the changing of their perspective.
We're not asking you to change what you say - we're asking you to change the way you say it.
In other news: we now have a small "welcome box" between the "enter a question" box and the questions below. Suggestions welcome for things we could pop in there.
All the best,
Ed
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AB Editor. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Kiki-frog
lol, duncer, if that's your view of God, then your God is indeed a vengeful God.
There are loads of people of various faiths that see their God or Goddess as being loving, and accept that as humans we are just not capable of seeing the full picture. Which is probably where some of the born again atheists get a bit muddled as they seem to think that all religions are to be taken literally by their adherents.
10:01 Sat 15th Sep 2012
The problem is not that atheists take religion seriously, it's that so many believers do.
We didn't start the fire . . . but someone needs to put it out.
lol, duncer, if that's your view of God, then your God is indeed a vengeful God.
There are loads of people of various faiths that see their God or Goddess as being loving, and accept that as humans we are just not capable of seeing the full picture. Which is probably where some of the born again atheists get a bit muddled as they seem to think that all religions are to be taken literally by their adherents.
10:01 Sat 15th Sep 2012
The problem is not that atheists take religion seriously, it's that so many believers do.
We didn't start the fire . . . but someone needs to put it out.
lol, duncer, if that's your view of God, then your God is indeed a vengeful God.
I was being tongue in cheek Kiki, but I do remember hearing this preached as a sprog, along with fire, brimstone and the gnashing of teeth. No mention of virgins awaiting me in heaven though, which is a pity, as therre are precious few of legal age down here?
I was being tongue in cheek Kiki, but I do remember hearing this preached as a sprog, along with fire, brimstone and the gnashing of teeth. No mention of virgins awaiting me in heaven though, which is a pity, as therre are precious few of legal age down here?
IMO R&S is without doubt the best section on AB and I would hate to see it 'toned down'. The most articulate, elegant, intelligent and persuasive posts can be found here, indeed so much so that at least three people I know of have been moved to change their beliefs directly through what they have learned from these threads.
Any of us can get a mauling on any section of AB so if you can't stand the heat ...
I don't think one section should be singled out because of name calling. Is it really worse here than elsewhere? I trust we are not doing this because religion is involved.
Any of us can get a mauling on any section of AB so if you can't stand the heat ...
I don't think one section should be singled out because of name calling. Is it really worse here than elsewhere? I trust we are not doing this because religion is involved.
Sorry sandy, no, the other way round, one was me but I was agnostic, now atheist. I think Ummmm might have been the same if I remember correctly. I'm sure she'll let me know if I'm wrong.
The other example where debate has changed somebody's beliefs, that I can remember, wasn't in R&S but in News, so sorry about that. I didn't realise until I just found it. It was when Jackthehat won whiskeryron over to her way of thinking in the thread below at 18.45 on Monday 9th April. In my defence the thread would not have been out of place in R&S.
http:// www.the answerb ...uest ion1122 053-6.h tml
Sandy, keep trying, you never know:-)
The other example where debate has changed somebody's beliefs, that I can remember, wasn't in R&S but in News, so sorry about that. I didn't realise until I just found it. It was when Jackthehat won whiskeryron over to her way of thinking in the thread below at 18.45 on Monday 9th April. In my defence the thread would not have been out of place in R&S.
http://
Sandy, keep trying, you never know:-)
"What we need in this world generally is a lot less respect for other people's opinions. It's staying quiet that allows bad things to happen."
Yes, but you're not doing anything about it though are you? You're not marching the streets with a placard, you're not writing to your MP, you're not running for office to bring about change...
You're having a natter on the internet...
And, that being the case, I'd like you to be able to do it without being rude to one another.
Yes, but you're not doing anything about it though are you? You're not marching the streets with a placard, you're not writing to your MP, you're not running for office to bring about change...
You're having a natter on the internet...
And, that being the case, I'd like you to be able to do it without being rude to one another.
"As has already been said, the problem is that some (but by no means all) religious people take offence whenever they perceive that their theological world-view is being questioned."
I am not saying that this isn't true, sometimes.
I am also saying that I've seen you at the front of the pitchfork carrying rabble when it's time to lynch a Christian. Sometimes.
I am merely asking for civility. As you're a rational human being you should easily be able to see both perspectives.
I am not saying that this isn't true, sometimes.
I am also saying that I've seen you at the front of the pitchfork carrying rabble when it's time to lynch a Christian. Sometimes.
I am merely asking for civility. As you're a rational human being you should easily be able to see both perspectives.
//The bit where the book gets called "magic" - it's intentionally said to wind up the other party.//
Actually, I don’t think that’s true at all. I think it’s a genuine opinion. When wooden sticks are cast upon the ground and become live snakes, and people walk on water, and clay models of birds are transformed into living creatures by blowing upon them, looking at it rationally, I consider all of that to be as a result of nothing more than magic tricks.
Actually, I don’t think that’s true at all. I think it’s a genuine opinion. When wooden sticks are cast upon the ground and become live snakes, and people walk on water, and clay models of birds are transformed into living creatures by blowing upon them, looking at it rationally, I consider all of that to be as a result of nothing more than magic tricks.