News1 min ago
Which God Are You A Witness?
88 Answers
The atheist of today, thinks that in this modern nuclear, space age it has become old-fashioned to believe in an invisible god.
Yet today every worshiper who claims to have a atheist god is challenged to act as witness for his god. In fact, all the gods, who are worshiped as gods are challenged to produce their witnesses to prove that they are gods or are the one living and true God.
Every reasonable person will agree that there is no use in worshiping and serving a false god.
Yet today every worshiper who claims to have a atheist god is challenged to act as witness for his god. In fact, all the gods, who are worshiped as gods are challenged to produce their witnesses to prove that they are gods or are the one living and true God.
Every reasonable person will agree that there is no use in worshiping and serving a false god.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by goodlife. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Goodlife - “... The atheist of today, thinks that in this modern nuclear, space age it has become old-fashioned to believe in an invisible god... every worshiper who claims to have a atheist god is challenged... Every reasonable person will agree that there is no use in worshiping and serving a false god...”
I could comment on the content of this laughable attempt at a 'question' but there would be no point. Goodlife simply doesn't get it.
I could comment on the content of this laughable attempt at a 'question' but there would be no point. Goodlife simply doesn't get it.
Dreamtime, aborigine beliefs make sense to me. It calls on creation and ancestors.
http://
http://
There are millions of people who claim to be godless, atheistic, not committed to any god. But they contradict themselves by worshiping a national god, football stars, actors, politicians and pop stars. Just because some claim that God is nonexistent does not make it so. You need to look in the right places for things, even for God. Not having found Him does not alter the fact that he exists. So can it be that many people have been looking in the wrong places for him?
http://
Lazygun@With regard to your comments re Henry Gee.
I have no need to apologise because I was not passing of his work as my own. If I was, I would not have been using his name.
My cut & pastes which you all so lovingly comment about are not always so. If I do, then I have permission to do so because the articles are not credited to anyone person. All articles are anonymous.
Are you all telling me, that not one single one of you has ever cut and paste? If you do, I tell you, “you are all liars”.
If my punctuation etc is not perfect, that is because I am not perfect. I admit my education was somewhat limited. Not all of us can be Grade A students!
But I am not on here to get certificates or commendations, I am here just to express my belief in a Creator and to give others to the opportunity of knowing that there is a God who cares and that he is very soon going to bring an end to the problems of mankind. If you don’t want to know, so be it. At the end of the day not one of you can say “I didn’t know. No one told me”.
http://
Lazygun@With regard to your comments re Henry Gee.
I have no need to apologise because I was not passing of his work as my own. If I was, I would not have been using his name.
My cut & pastes which you all so lovingly comment about are not always so. If I do, then I have permission to do so because the articles are not credited to anyone person. All articles are anonymous.
Are you all telling me, that not one single one of you has ever cut and paste? If you do, I tell you, “you are all liars”.
If my punctuation etc is not perfect, that is because I am not perfect. I admit my education was somewhat limited. Not all of us can be Grade A students!
But I am not on here to get certificates or commendations, I am here just to express my belief in a Creator and to give others to the opportunity of knowing that there is a God who cares and that he is very soon going to bring an end to the problems of mankind. If you don’t want to know, so be it. At the end of the day not one of you can say “I didn’t know. No one told me”.
Well lets change 'God' to philosophy or belief.
Certainly on here atheists are continuously 'giving witness' to that on a dailly basis.
But more that philosophy calls back demonstrating it's reality
I turn on a light - the electrons flow the light appears - each time, every time
I type on the computer the laws of Science communicate my words to you.
In comparison - you pray for peace and wars rage
you pray for justice and the weak are abused
You give us excuses about 'Gods will' and 'God does not answer every prayer'
Who's 'God' has the power?
Certainly on here atheists are continuously 'giving witness' to that on a dailly basis.
But more that philosophy calls back demonstrating it's reality
I turn on a light - the electrons flow the light appears - each time, every time
I type on the computer the laws of Science communicate my words to you.
In comparison - you pray for peace and wars rage
you pray for justice and the weak are abused
You give us excuses about 'Gods will' and 'God does not answer every prayer'
Who's 'God' has the power?
Goodlife, //But they contradict themselves by worshiping a national god, football stars, actors, politicians and pop stars.//
You compare the abandonment of your own intellect in order to worship a mythical supernatural deity to following the careers of pop stars et al? How ridiculous! Don’t be so silly! I'm a very patient person, but the nonsense you spout really does stretch me at times!!
You compare the abandonment of your own intellect in order to worship a mythical supernatural deity to following the careers of pop stars et al? How ridiculous! Don’t be so silly! I'm a very patient person, but the nonsense you spout really does stretch me at times!!
Goodlife...ALL gods are false, that's the point !
The main standpoint of every religion is that yours is the truth, therefore all the others must be false. You can't have your cake and eat it.
It doesn't matter which god you choose...they were all invented by man at some time in the past. Gods are still being invented even now, when we have pretty-near universal education, especially in the West.
Most of the "new" religions have been made up in the States, a country so advanced that they put a man on the Moon !
The main standpoint of every religion is that yours is the truth, therefore all the others must be false. You can't have your cake and eat it.
It doesn't matter which god you choose...they were all invented by man at some time in the past. Gods are still being invented even now, when we have pretty-near universal education, especially in the West.
Most of the "new" religions have been made up in the States, a country so advanced that they put a man on the Moon !
@goodlife
You posted this nonsense - finally some recognition about the misquotation and intellectual dishonesty.
"Lazygun@With regard to your comments re Henry Gee.
I have no need to apologise because I was not passing of his work as my own. If I was, I would not have been using his name.
My cut & pastes which you all so lovingly comment about are not always so. If I do, then I have permission to do so because the articles are not credited to anyone person. All articles are anonymous.
Are you all telling me, that not one single one of you has ever cut and paste? If you do, I tell you, “you are all liars”.
If my punctuation etc is not perfect, that is because I am not perfect. I admit my education was somewhat limited. Not all of us can be Grade A students! "
Lets be clear here. You did not mention Prof.Henry Gee in your original post when you used his quotation, attempting to pass it off as your own commentary - I had to point that out to you , as did at least one other poster!
Even then you ignored what we had pointed out. Lets be clear here. The man you quoted, Prof.Henry Gee, categorically rejects your interpretation of his words, your quote of which is cherry-picked and used our of context.
This is intellectual dishonesty. This could be considered plagiarism. To ignore comments about your activity is cowardice.
You cut and paste screeds. I, and others here have asked you repeatedly to at least attribute the cut and paste - which you never do. Better still would be to summarise what you intend to post, then provide a link to the original source - but you never do.
Instead you continually cut and paste screeds of text, without attribution or acknowledgement that you are in fact quoting from somewhere else. This is intellectually dishonest. It deprives the readership of the context and the source and possible bias of what you post.
It could be considered plagiarism, since unless we ourselves check the text, you are effectively passing off someone elses work as your own, and that is lying, basically.
No other contributor here, well apart from maybe your fellow JWs does this. All of us will cut and paste from time to time, but we all attribute it, or place it in quotation marks, or whatever, or provide a link to the original.
If your god were actually real, rather than imagined, what do you think he would make of your dishonesty?
You posted this nonsense - finally some recognition about the misquotation and intellectual dishonesty.
"Lazygun@With regard to your comments re Henry Gee.
I have no need to apologise because I was not passing of his work as my own. If I was, I would not have been using his name.
My cut & pastes which you all so lovingly comment about are not always so. If I do, then I have permission to do so because the articles are not credited to anyone person. All articles are anonymous.
Are you all telling me, that not one single one of you has ever cut and paste? If you do, I tell you, “you are all liars”.
If my punctuation etc is not perfect, that is because I am not perfect. I admit my education was somewhat limited. Not all of us can be Grade A students! "
Lets be clear here. You did not mention Prof.Henry Gee in your original post when you used his quotation, attempting to pass it off as your own commentary - I had to point that out to you , as did at least one other poster!
Even then you ignored what we had pointed out. Lets be clear here. The man you quoted, Prof.Henry Gee, categorically rejects your interpretation of his words, your quote of which is cherry-picked and used our of context.
This is intellectual dishonesty. This could be considered plagiarism. To ignore comments about your activity is cowardice.
You cut and paste screeds. I, and others here have asked you repeatedly to at least attribute the cut and paste - which you never do. Better still would be to summarise what you intend to post, then provide a link to the original source - but you never do.
Instead you continually cut and paste screeds of text, without attribution or acknowledgement that you are in fact quoting from somewhere else. This is intellectually dishonest. It deprives the readership of the context and the source and possible bias of what you post.
It could be considered plagiarism, since unless we ourselves check the text, you are effectively passing off someone elses work as your own, and that is lying, basically.
No other contributor here, well apart from maybe your fellow JWs does this. All of us will cut and paste from time to time, but we all attribute it, or place it in quotation marks, or whatever, or provide a link to the original.
If your god were actually real, rather than imagined, what do you think he would make of your dishonesty?
goodlife, I have never cut and pasted in all the years I have posted on this site. An apology is duie for calling me a liar, don't you think?
modeller, I wish you luck with your Santa/Tooth Fairy question. It is some years since I asked this question several times: since those two and God are supernatural creatures who are supposed to do magical things which never happen and for whose existence there is not a scrap of evidence, why believe in one and not the other two?
Still awaiting an answer.
modeller, I wish you luck with your Santa/Tooth Fairy question. It is some years since I asked this question several times: since those two and God are supernatural creatures who are supposed to do magical things which never happen and for whose existence there is not a scrap of evidence, why believe in one and not the other two?
Still awaiting an answer.
Naomi you better do what Bible suggests. Ask the very beasts, and they will teach you; ask the wild birds—they will tell you; crawling creatures will instruct you, fish in the sea will inform you.”—Job 12:7- 8, and you say you know your Bible, you all think you do.
WaldoMcFroog@ you must be boy if you can’t work that one out.
WaldoMcFroog@ you must be boy if you can’t work that one out.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.