OG, //If that is the case [that God is restricted] Naomi then I'm unsure how much common ground there is to discuss the subject at all.//
If we are to discuss the nature of God, we must discuss it from the point of view of religion because that’s where the concept of God arises, that is the only common ground, and religion tells us that God is omnipotent. Therefore, we have no alternative but to assume (for the sake of discussion) that he is omnipotent. If we suppose that he is restricted in any way, it follows that he cannot be omnipotent, and we then move into the territory of discussing a personal God – a product of our own imaginations – and not the fellow religion tells us exists.
//Before tackling why this or that is the case I think one needs to understand why anything at all needs to be.//
Science has a pretty good explanation for that, but since we’re talking about God, it is a question that cannot be answered. I have no idea why God would have wanted to create anything at all, and less still why he would have wanted to impose misery, pain, and guilt upon mankind. I cannot imagine something as powerful and as wise as this God is reputed to be, being so utterly cruel, vengeful – and narcissistic.