Aliens On The Moon? Why Have We Never Returned Back To The Moon?

[Henrietta]

There are many many videos and information on this theory and it really blow my mind it seems the more deeper I go the more I find and the more that compels me to keep digging.

I think that this the real "rabbit hole" and needs investigating/explaining.

Apparently there are many cover ups/lies and misinformation being spread by the main space body with 4 letters.

What are you thoughts on alien bases on the dark side of the moon/u.f.o's being sighted on/around the moon and various other things which point to the face that we are not alone and many on earth know the truth and do not want to share with us?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmRwQCoK_XY

[naomi24]

Sorry, my mistake. sandyRoe posted the initial link - I posted a subsequent link which is the one I'm talking about. Here you are.

[jomifl]

A few points, 1. the flying model is similar ony in that it has wings, 2. many bizarrely shaped objects can be made to fly look on youtube.
Is it surprising that model birds could sometimes fly, I cannot see where the 'alien' input is.
Australian aboriginals make very efficient boomerangs without a degree in aerodynamics.

[naomi24]

//the flying model is similar ony in that it has wings//

I'm assuming you mean similar to an aircraft? I suggest you look again. Funny looking tail area for a bird - not to mention the 'seat' tucked in behind its 'windshield'! Nice try though. ;o)

[ll_billym]

I love how in the video they say they they 'didn't have to add much parts to this shape because this shape is perfect'.

Only the engine then, not much parts at all really.

[naomi24]

ll_billym, No, apparently that's about all it needed - but it couldn't have flown without an engine, so I'll allow them that.

[jomifl]

No Naomi, I mean the flying model is similar to the ancient artifact only in that it has wings, oh and is gold. It is quite feasible that ancient people had toy gliders based on flying animals, it doesn't mean that they had or have seen man carrying aircraft or even aliens.

[jomifl]

The modern flying model could fly without an engine just as almost any aircraft can, it is termed gliding.

[mikey4444]

Please guys ! ...can we call a halt to this debate now ? Its getting more pointless and tedious everytime I log in !

[jomifl]

Too right Mikey....

[naomi24]

Oh my! How funny! If none of you knew the background to this item, or its age, but assumed it was modern in origin, I wonder what you’d say it represents? I could make a guess. ;o)

Mikey, If you don’t like it don’t read it. You’ve no business trying to halt any discussion here. And Jom, you’re under no obligation to stay either.

[Khandro]

The only thing which is extraordinary on here, is the discovery that there are people gullible enough to to believe in the most crackpot, idiotic spoofs, and yet dismiss the concept of a God as an originator of the Universe, out of hand.

[jomifl]

Divebuddy, I don't think we are making much progress here, none so blind etc.

[jomifl]

Khandro, It should surprise me but it doesn't any longer...

[mibn2cweus]

It's a bird, it's a plane, no wait, it's . . . it's

http://justoutsidetheboxcartoon.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/img_3799.jpg

[jomifl]

Just copied this from the comments on this model found on Youtube
'It is a phallic symbol. A winged phallic symbol, a common motif in many cultures. Just in case you missed it. They built a flying penis.'

[jomifl]

alternatively some context throws a different light upon it..
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/82988848/