Aliens On The Moon? Why Have We Never Returned Back To The Moon?

[Henrietta]

There are many many videos and information on this theory and it really blow my mind it seems the more deeper I go the more I find and the more that compels me to keep digging.

I think that this the real "rabbit hole" and needs investigating/explaining.

Apparently there are many cover ups/lies and misinformation being spread by the main space body with 4 letters.

What are you thoughts on alien bases on the dark side of the moon/u.f.o's being sighted on/around the moon and various other things which point to the face that we are not alone and many on earth know the truth and do not want to share with us?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmRwQCoK_XY

[jomifl]

/so why you’re addressing a post about aliens on the moon to me I have no idea./
err... because that is what this thread was supposed to be about?

[mikey4444]

LOL Jomifl !

[ll_billym]

So the premise is that NASA wants to hide evidence of alien things on the moon, therefore they release the images that they have taken of all the alien things to the general public to use in 'documentaries' such as these. I don't think so.

[naomi24]

Jom, err ...but that's not what you and I have been talking about....

[jomifl]

I think you will find that I have been talking about the lack of aliens all the time.

[naomi24]

Jom, I’ll find? I’ve looked - and if only! Rather than telling us why you think there is a “lack of aliens”, most of what I can see from you is confined to joining the baying mob, none of whom speak from first-hand experience of reading his works, in attacking a writer, and by extension, me.

Personally, I don’t care what he’s done – or what anyone thinks he’s done – or that the collective, vitriolic, knitting needles are going ten to the dozen. Nothing detracts from the possibility that his basic theory could be correct. However, such is the herd mentality here that none of you, it seems, are capable of stepping beyond it, and hence, between you, you have rendered intelligent discussion on the subject impossible. Sad.

[mikey4444]

Nanu, nanu !

[naomi24]

Whoosh!

[sandyRoe]

Is it not time some stardust was sprinkled on this thread and it was allowed to drift quietly off to sleep?

[jomifl]

/ you have rendered intelligent discussion on the subject impossible./
Intelligent discussion of this subject has always been impossible because the protagonists of EvD's arguments seem to be incapable of distinguishing fact from fiction. He is the diametric opposite of a scientist, he assembles a miscellany of 'facts' which support his views whilst ignoring their context or the opinion of experts in the areas from which the facts have been abstracted. His theories have long been demonstrated to be silliness in the extreme.

[sandyRoe]

That should have been 'moondust' rather than 'stardust' in my post at 8:35.

[jomifl]

Naomi when EvD's book came out the 'baying mob' supported his ideas, now they don't. How come a majority that disagrees with you becomes a 'baying mob', I think you are being discourteous, some of the people who dismiss him as a charlatan know what they are talking about.

[jomifl]

Sandy, duly noted will correct logic stream accordingly.

[naomi24]

Jom, And there you go again. Think what you like about me, but is it really that difficult for you – and ‘the majority’ - to separate one interesting and potentially sound idea - the one I've been talking about throughout this thread - from anything else? None of you seem to be able to grasp just one simple concept. As I said to Mikey, “Whoosh!” Right over your head!

[jomifl]

Naomi, something passed over our heads? I think not, but do please remind us what your point was if it was something other than the fantasies of EvD.

[jim360]

But an idea is only as sound as the evidence to support it. That evidence is shaky at best. Some of it is utterly flawed. This casts serious doubt on the original idea. It's not a "baying mob" attitude to say so.

[naomi24]

Jom, You know exactly what I’m talking about. Smartarse responses add nothing to the discussion.

Jim, I would ask if you’ve examined any evidence there may be in any detail, but we’ve established previously that you haven’t.

[Khandro]

"KLAATU...BARADA...NIKTO!"

[naomi24]

No, Khandro, much earlier than that.

[jim360]

Some of the evidence has been shown to be bogus. You've even conceded this it seems . I don't need to analyse it again just to reconfirm that. The only argument is how much this matters for the central idea. Really it should matter more than you seem to allow.