Coworker Mad At Me For Keeping A Selfie...
Business & Finance3 mins ago
Freedom To Choose
91 Answers
Why do religious people think that we have a CHOICE in what we believe or dont believe?
I had an interesting conversation this morning with a couple of door knocking JW's. Unlike most people I actually enjoy a bit of banter with them when they come knocking, actually makes me feel good that I'm relatively sane when they've gone.
The conversation went along the lines that we have a choice to accept (their version of ) God. I pointed out that belief is not a choice, I cant make myself believe something that I find patently absurd. My present beliefs (religious, political or otherwise) are based on my level of understanding to date aquirred through knowledge and experience. They then talked about the need for repentance when I pointed out that that in itself is a belief...and one that I dont share as I dont see myself as a sinner in need of forgiveness from some deity. They seemed a bit aghast at that. I pointed out that I was quiet aware of my shortcomings but that wasnt the same thing as sin, which is an alien concept to me.
What I didnt point out to them was that I went through a religious period in my teenage years but eventually had to give it up as I valued truth over doctrine...I couldnt 'make' myself believe what I was been taught anymore than I could still believe in Santa.
I just wondered if any religious ABers (goodlife, keyplus etc) can grasp the concept that non believers are not non believers by choice but by understanding, experience and knowledge?
Thanks
I had an interesting conversation this morning with a couple of door knocking JW's. Unlike most people I actually enjoy a bit of banter with them when they come knocking, actually makes me feel good that I'm relatively sane when they've gone.
The conversation went along the lines that we have a choice to accept (their version of ) God. I pointed out that belief is not a choice, I cant make myself believe something that I find patently absurd. My present beliefs (religious, political or otherwise) are based on my level of understanding to date aquirred through knowledge and experience. They then talked about the need for repentance when I pointed out that that in itself is a belief...and one that I dont share as I dont see myself as a sinner in need of forgiveness from some deity. They seemed a bit aghast at that. I pointed out that I was quiet aware of my shortcomings but that wasnt the same thing as sin, which is an alien concept to me.
What I didnt point out to them was that I went through a religious period in my teenage years but eventually had to give it up as I valued truth over doctrine...I couldnt 'make' myself believe what I was been taught anymore than I could still believe in Santa.
I just wondered if any religious ABers (goodlife, keyplus etc) can grasp the concept that non believers are not non believers by choice but by understanding, experience and knowledge?
Thanks
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by nailit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Khandro, that is a bit of an assumption, I have experienced religion most of my life and so have as good an understanding of it as anyone else. Feel free to explain how failure to believe something unproven is an indication of bigotry. I would have thought that the contrary view was a more potent indicator. What all religion hangs upon is the proof of existence of a deity or deities, so until that little problem is overcome I adopt the default positon and say must try harder. Nice attempt to sidetrack by the way...
jomifl; My reference is to my post 20:00 Wed, i.e. the sharing of bread, not religion per se
When David Cameron says how important to him is the weekly partaking of a Sung Eucharist service, many will know what he means; I know what he means and - on this thread - I think Sandy knows what he means, it may be presumptuous of me to say it, but I suspect, you don't know what he means, therefore I suggest that your denigration of something you do not understand, might be described as an act of atheistic bigotry, n'est pas?
When David Cameron says how important to him is the weekly partaking of a Sung Eucharist service, many will know what he means; I know what he means and - on this thread - I think Sandy knows what he means, it may be presumptuous of me to say it, but I suspect, you don't know what he means, therefore I suggest that your denigration of something you do not understand, might be described as an act of atheistic bigotry, n'est pas?
jomifl; //please explain where I denigrated something I don't understand.//
Well there was this, and lots more;
//I'm always ready for religion Khandro, thats why it doesn't get past my garbage filter...//
What I suggest is, that which David Cameron and many others find life-enhancing (Sung Eucharist) you do not comprehend, but you feel competent enough to call it garbage.
Well there was this, and lots more;
//I'm always ready for religion Khandro, thats why it doesn't get past my garbage filter...//
What I suggest is, that which David Cameron and many others find life-enhancing (Sung Eucharist) you do not comprehend, but you feel competent enough to call it garbage.
Naomi, Khandro is just having a dig at me because I suggested that someone wouldn't understand my explanation of why Earthappears to be so suited to life, his answer suggests that I was correct, It is really of no consequence and I don't expect to get a reasoned reply but thanks for the support. As for the sung eucharist, it is of even less consequence other than to the participants who seem to enjoy it as much as a nights clubbing..
