If The Person Who Named Walkie Talkies...
ChatterBank1 min ago
Proof Of God?
134 Answers
With so many scientists believeing in God, and proofs such as intelligent design established, and the valid criticisms of evolution not being successfully challenged, would you now at least consider the possibility of a universe created by a conscious mind, God?
So many great highly intelligent people never questioned the existence of God, so does that not give you pause for thought?
J.C. Ryle, Tozer, Spurgeon, Hudson Taylor, Isaac Newton, to name just a tiny few?
If you embrace atheism, ask yourself, do you know more than these people?
And what do you know?
So many great highly intelligent people never questioned the existence of God, so does that not give you pause for thought?
J.C. Ryle, Tozer, Spurgeon, Hudson Taylor, Isaac Newton, to name just a tiny few?
If you embrace atheism, ask yourself, do you know more than these people?
And what do you know?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Vetuste - I thoroughly respect the views that are poles apart to mine.
All I ask is a conversation, not, "Yahboo," mud slinging designed to belittle me.
The kindest thing I get on here so times is a cross examination, like I have committed a crime.
All I do is assert my belief in God, and never preach fire and brimstone, in spite of being accused of "stuffing it down people's throats."
Never done that, never would.
All I ask is a conversation, not, "Yahboo," mud slinging designed to belittle me.
The kindest thing I get on here so times is a cross examination, like I have committed a crime.
All I do is assert my belief in God, and never preach fire and brimstone, in spite of being accused of "stuffing it down people's throats."
Never done that, never would.
The Theory of Evolution is supported by more evidence than any other science. There are no valid criticisms that have not been addressed.
In science it doesn't matter about the credentials of those who hold a belief. Everything is beholden to evidence. Einstein never accepted Uncertainty but the facts prevailed. That is why science has been so successful at comprehending nature.
Religion depends on "ancient unquestionable truths" and the opinions of "wise men" which is why it is utterly hopeless at explaining anything.
In science it doesn't matter about the credentials of those who hold a belief. Everything is beholden to evidence. Einstein never accepted Uncertainty but the facts prevailed. That is why science has been so successful at comprehending nature.
Religion depends on "ancient unquestionable truths" and the opinions of "wise men" which is why it is utterly hopeless at explaining anything.
n. It depends on which religion - it's all metaphor anyway in all religions, and if I'm to have a metaphor, I personally love to think of the Cosmic Dance of Shiva Nataraga, - pacing out the creation of the universe in his ecstatic dance, simultaneously combining the benignly creative and the destructive forces of divinity.
But I think you would prefer to dwell on the outpourings of twerps like R.Dawkins, who thinks is all a "happy accident"! :0)
But I think you would prefer to dwell on the outpourings of twerps like R.Dawkins, who thinks is all a "happy accident"! :0)
naomi; Even the scientists at CERN like the Shiva metaphor;
https:/
https:/
