Welcome To Flowers Italy - Your Premier...
Business & Finance10 mins ago
Creation / Evolution.
400 Answers
What can you say that you know one thing about evolution?
Answers
Quite aside from anything else, you are still setting far too much store by the people who are speaking, and far too little by what they are actually saying. Evaluate the evidence for yourself, if you can -- what one PhD says, or a Professor, or even a Nobel Laureate or two, means nothing. They may be right or they may be wrong, but who they are is irrelevant to that....
14:20 Thu 06th Feb 2020
Theland's religion is built entirely on the giant presumption that some ignorant Bronze Age misogynists who were too stupid to be goat herders managed to become the fountain of all knowledge obtained from a god for which there is absolutely no evidence and despite the fact that what they claimed has been unambiguously proven wrong and an affront to common sense.
Meanwhile he refuses to address my explanation based on solid evidence for how small genetic changes accumulated into the divergence of humans and chimp from a common ancestor over five million years.
He claimed I made too many assumptions (his favourite retort) yet has not specified what I am supposed to have assumed, despite being asked repeatedly. He simply ignores what I say because he has no answer.
Intellectually he is a pathetic coward and an arrogant fool with zero credibility.
Meanwhile he refuses to address my explanation based on solid evidence for how small genetic changes accumulated into the divergence of humans and chimp from a common ancestor over five million years.
He claimed I made too many assumptions (his favourite retort) yet has not specified what I am supposed to have assumed, despite being asked repeatedly. He simply ignores what I say because he has no answer.
Intellectually he is a pathetic coward and an arrogant fool with zero credibility.
// Vulcan - Species have the ability to adapt to their surroundings, but remain the same species.//
o god we are almost there ! so evolution DOES exist but it doesnt account for speciation
and so theland - where is the dividing line - where the change is so great that it is another species
we have also overcome readers, I have to see something before I say it occurs,
by the way - with intelligent design - I was thinking about that and thinking what a complete waste of time it all was
God has not given up creating after seven days
he is doing it even now? -
now tell me Theland - where is THAT idea in genesis?
o god we are almost there ! so evolution DOES exist but it doesnt account for speciation
and so theland - where is the dividing line - where the change is so great that it is another species
we have also overcome readers, I have to see something before I say it occurs,
by the way - with intelligent design - I was thinking about that and thinking what a complete waste of time it all was
God has not given up creating after seven days
he is doing it even now? -
now tell me Theland - where is THAT idea in genesis?
// No way does he have evidence that a light sensitive patch of skin evolved into an eye.//
that is because you dont understand the argument of Dawkins
Slippery Sam asked Darwin whether the monkey was on his grandfathers side or mother
you dont look at a jelly fish and say oo that evolved into a mammalian eye ( well we know it didnt but ...) you have to look at the fossil record - which doesnt really record soft forms
( altho the precambian shales stuck up a canadian mountain are an exception)
that is because you dont understand the argument of Dawkins
Slippery Sam asked Darwin whether the monkey was on his grandfathers side or mother
you dont look at a jelly fish and say oo that evolved into a mammalian eye ( well we know it didnt but ...) you have to look at the fossil record - which doesnt really record soft forms
( altho the precambian shales stuck up a canadian mountain are an exception)
They do not remain the same species, since defining a species is a subjective human pigeonholeing activity at any point down the oath of change they can be considered to be a different species to their ancestors.
Split a species into two groups without the ability or the desire to mingle and they can follow different paths, different mutations, different environments and end up as separate but related species to each other.
Split a species into two groups without the ability or the desire to mingle and they can follow different paths, different mutations, different environments and end up as separate but related species to each other.
MY question about evolution has not been answered.
Beso provided lists of supporting evidence for his religious faith in evolution, but for every point he made there are palaeontologists, microbiologists, chemists, and PhD s in other disciplines who can dismiss his evidence.
Of course Beso could not resist the temptation to show off and turned this thread into a *** competition, and finished off by hiding behind anonymity to insult me.
Who is the coward?
He is rather sad.
Beso provided lists of supporting evidence for his religious faith in evolution, but for every point he made there are palaeontologists, microbiologists, chemists, and PhD s in other disciplines who can dismiss his evidence.
Of course Beso could not resist the temptation to show off and turned this thread into a *** competition, and finished off by hiding behind anonymity to insult me.
Who is the coward?
He is rather sad.
Naomi - I have presented evidence in the past concerning prophecy which you dismiss out of hand.
However, there have been and are scientists who are not believers who have come to the conclusion that the conundrums they face all point to an intelligence behind the universe. Such scientists are prepared to consider possibilities beyond their previously ingrained worldview.
However, there have been and are scientists who are not believers who have come to the conclusion that the conundrums they face all point to an intelligence behind the universe. Such scientists are prepared to consider possibilities beyond their previously ingrained worldview.
https:/
Evolution demolished.
About 25 mins in, Dawkins is stumped not being able to answer a simple question about the evolutionary religion of which he is the high priest.
Also, note how it is mentioned that Dawkins refuses debates, with Creationists, as he knows he cannot duck even simple questions.
He is OK on the lecture circuit, but weak in debate, and chooses his opponents carefully.
Yes, I know you don't like videos, but these are opinions that would take me days to research and write.
Flick through it, and get the gist.
Evolution demolished.
About 25 mins in, Dawkins is stumped not being able to answer a simple question about the evolutionary religion of which he is the high priest.
Also, note how it is mentioned that Dawkins refuses debates, with Creationists, as he knows he cannot duck even simple questions.
He is OK on the lecture circuit, but weak in debate, and chooses his opponents carefully.
Yes, I know you don't like videos, but these are opinions that would take me days to research and write.
Flick through it, and get the gist.
