Crosswords1 min ago
Would You Say God Is To Blame For All
159 Answers
Would you say GOD is to blame for all he suffering in the word to day . And if you do {AND WHY }
THE bibles answer to this question ? ? 2 Corinthias 11. 14 Ezekiel 28. 13,15
THE bibles answer to this question ? ? 2 Corinthias 11. 14 Ezekiel 28. 13,15
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by locusts. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// I think N has hit the nail on the head there.//
I cannot mention her name for fear of a long howwoooool !
remember the first commandment !
//That's quoting Isaiah, not God. Who says Isaiah's telling the truth?//
has hit the nail on the head
what was the Idea of God when that was written? we serious people call this Isaiah etc the old covenant and the new testament the new covenant
and the ideas have to be different because you cant otherwise separate old ( OT that is! ) from New (NT that is!)
God BC - my dean of chapel wrote a book on the the Jews idea of God in AD 0
God B.C. is a clear and profound guide to the spiritual world of the Old Testament, providing a highly readable introduction to the nature of the God whom Jesus called “Father”. It charts the relationship between God and God’s people Before Christ, and how that relationship informs our understanding of grace
my god! pun intended - its just been reprinted ! - first ed 1973
Jesus it is difficult to have a serious discussion on AB
I cannot mention her name for fear of a long howwoooool !
remember the first commandment !
//That's quoting Isaiah, not God. Who says Isaiah's telling the truth?//
has hit the nail on the head
what was the Idea of God when that was written? we serious people call this Isaiah etc the old covenant and the new testament the new covenant
and the ideas have to be different because you cant otherwise separate old ( OT that is! ) from New (NT that is!)
God BC - my dean of chapel wrote a book on the the Jews idea of God in AD 0
God B.C. is a clear and profound guide to the spiritual world of the Old Testament, providing a highly readable introduction to the nature of the God whom Jesus called “Father”. It charts the relationship between God and God’s people Before Christ, and how that relationship informs our understanding of grace
my god! pun intended - its just been reprinted ! - first ed 1973
Jesus it is difficult to have a serious discussion on AB
Theland, //God created evil. Right, on the face of it He is responsible for every evil great and small, and this is something you push time and time again.
You are wrong.//
I believe what he is alleged to have said. Why don’t you?
As for humility, it’s about time you found the humility to confess that whilst you accuse me of error, you are constantly at a loss to explain those errors to me. Saying I'm wrong just doesn't wash, Theland.
You are wrong.//
I believe what he is alleged to have said. Why don’t you?
As for humility, it’s about time you found the humility to confess that whilst you accuse me of error, you are constantly at a loss to explain those errors to me. Saying I'm wrong just doesn't wash, Theland.
Theland, you said you absented yourself because you worried that people may think you were 'preaching'.
Since you still lack the basic courtesy and humility that most non-Christians possess, and you being the more fervent type, your absence is correspondingly larger, you clearly need reminding of the main reason why people dislike your attitude on here - you are preaching, you always do, you always will.
Since you still lack the basic courtesy and humility that most non-Christians possess, and you being the more fervent type, your absence is correspondingly larger, you clearly need reminding of the main reason why people dislike your attitude on here - you are preaching, you always do, you always will.
I don't know all of the answers, and I'm not afraid to say so.
I am constantly learning, and the more I learn, the clearer the bible becomes, but I realise I still have a long way to go.
Your biggest error is failing to understand the basic message of the gospel, as well as suppressing any evidence that challenges your naturalistic worldview.
Having said all that, you are not a serious sceptic enquirer, but only like a few others, looking for anything with which to attack the bible, and that against a backdrop of a failure to even guess at the answers to the big questions.
Your whole position is really laughable.
I am constantly learning, and the more I learn, the clearer the bible becomes, but I realise I still have a long way to go.
Your biggest error is failing to understand the basic message of the gospel, as well as suppressing any evidence that challenges your naturalistic worldview.
Having said all that, you are not a serious sceptic enquirer, but only like a few others, looking for anything with which to attack the bible, and that against a backdrop of a failure to even guess at the answers to the big questions.
Your whole position is really laughable.
Theland - // No Andy I respectfully presented my opinion.
You are being insulting. //
If you are so thin skinned that you think having your preaching pointed out to you constitutes an insult, then this is clearly not the forum debate for you.
Maybe you would be better joining those who take a step-ladder and a speaker system out into their town centre and harangue the passers-by with their failings - the passers-by tend not to answer back.
They don't take any notice either of course, but they don't answer back.
You are being insulting. //
If you are so thin skinned that you think having your preaching pointed out to you constitutes an insult, then this is clearly not the forum debate for you.
Maybe you would be better joining those who take a step-ladder and a speaker system out into their town centre and harangue the passers-by with their failings - the passers-by tend not to answer back.
They don't take any notice either of course, but they don't answer back.