What evidence are you citing, Goodlife? What convinces one person will not convince another. For example- My wife is convinced that, despite evidence to the contrary, that homeopathy works. Some would equally argue, despite all the convincing evidence, that man never landed on the Moon. Or that Elvis lives. There is often a lot of disparity between what we see as evidence, as humans, and what one person sees as "proof", can very often be seen as the exact opposite by others. Some will claim to go by the "scientific consensus" to back up their beliefs, which as we know, means nothing, except that a lot of people believe the same way as you do. Others will see proof where none exists; others will argue, when presented with, say, a rock, that it isn't a rock, it's a boulder. Or a pebble. If this was not the case, and there was only one "right" answer to a question, Answerbank would be full of one-line answers, there would be no debate, and the world would become a more boring place.