Should we consider Muslims to be 'people' and treated like everyone else, or are they an insidious force bent on world domination, and as such, are denied such inclusion?
Well a world caliphate is their aim. Though of course that's a question of degree to which they ascribe individually. Like the Christian missionaries who wanted to convert, they have their conversion wing.
Yes, of course we should consider Muslims to be people and treated like everyone else - except those who want to blow us up. Goodgoalie has it in one. You're confusing people with philosophy.
naomi - // Yes, of course we should consider Muslims to be people and treated like everyone else - except those who want to blow us up. Goodgoalie has it in one. You're confusing people with philosophy. //
And you are shifting your oft-proclaimed position.
You constantly refer to Islam as a 'force' that is keen to take over the world, and scoff at the insistence from myself and others that the vast majority of Muslims are peace-loving people who have no wish to take over anything.
Now, because you have been caught out elsewhere, you are trying to convince me that you think Muslims should be 'treated as people'.
Do I have to copy and paste any of the endless posts you have made that directly contradicted that viewpoint?
Or can you simply admit that you are changing your position to blow with the wind.
naomi - // AH, Don't be silly. You tried hard to provoke an argument elsewhere - as you're doing here - but it didn't work and there was no discussion.
Copy and paste whatever you like. //
Patronising me is more of your smoke-blowing, so let's ignore it shall we.
Naomi - // What do you want to debate? I've given my answer to your OP. //
I want to debate your decades-long insistence that Islam is an evil force intent on taking over the world, following the Koran, etc ad nauseum, and your stance of the last couple of days, that Muslims should be treated as people like everyone else.
Why don;t we start with you advising which of those positions is real, and which is false, because you can't have it both ways.