Good morning Theland, with all due respect (as usual) what utter rubbish. Newsdesk isn't right at all - I don't 'worship' anything. I simply appreciate the magnitude of nature. I don't know how the universe began - neither does anyone else - but I'm not so arrogant to declare, as you do, that I know the answers. One thing I do know, though, is that I would never attribute any of it to your God. I do believe the bible to be, basically, an historical document, and my question is, who exactly was this God? Whoever he was (and he hasn't been around, at least physically, for a very long time) he displayed all the worst faults of mankind, he whizzed around in flying machines, and, according to you, he still expects accolades for all the good in the world, but will not accept responsibility for the bad. Take the Tsunami. Why? Ok, for argument's sake, you could say that we may be fundamentally responsible for that with our atom bombs, etc, but what about all the natural disasters that occurred before atom bombs? Nature, Theland, nature. (Ooo, I felt a bit like Hilda Ogden then - "Woman, Stanley, Woman").
As for all the stars we observe, in fact we observe very few. You say your God made the heavens to enable us to tell the seasons - oh, and to glorify himself (naturally! Mustn't forget that bit!). Why, then, did he make stars, and whole galaxies, in fact, which aren't visible from earth, even now, with all our technology? And why are new stars, which we can't see, still being formed? Oh, I know, when something that doesn't quite gel raises its head, you say we mustn't question - God works in mysterious ways. Whichever way we turn, this guy has a get out clause - and always set up for him by man. Theland, it's nonsense.
continued....